8 comments

  • petcat 27 minutes ago
    Will be curious to see if this ends up requiring Google/Apple accounts and mobile device attestation in order to work.
    • disiplus 1 minute ago
      if its like SEPA in europe then you dont need google or apple, its seperate network that you get access through your regular or digital bank
    • muizelaar 23 minutes ago
      Real-time Rail is for financial institutions to settle transactions not for direct consumer use.
      • wolttam 21 minutes ago
        > This new national payment system will transform day-to-day payments for Canadian businesses and consumers by enabling instant speed and settlement.

        It does sound like it's for consumers as well

  • ChrisArchitect 14 minutes ago
    Not so hot on the name, initially thought it was some kind of train system payment thing. But that just lends to the coverage of this out in random mainstream media confusing consumers - not really a consumer thing but an infrastructure thing on the backend for banks/institutions. On the consumer side many will immediately think of Interac eTransfers, which this has little to do with as far as consumer experience, but it will also use this on the backend for things. Carry on.
    • embedding-shape 9 minutes ago
      Yeah, why on earth would they shove "Rail" into that name? I'm sure it makes sense internally, but as external name it doesn't make much sense. None of the people are even using the rail/train analogies that are right there, then what's the point even?!
  • ChrisArchitect 46 minutes ago
    • ocd 34 minutes ago
      Updated.
  • tamimio 36 minutes ago
    The article didn’t mention how is this different from current interac, and great to see wealthsimple is already in it!
    • toomuchtodo 31 minutes ago
      Canada's Interac is anagolous to US' Zelle payment network (which is owned by the largest US commercial banks), while RTR is the US FedNow equivalent ("true" instant payment and settlement with broader use case support, operated as a utility by the US Federal Reserve).

      https://www.redcompasslabs.com/insights/why-canada-needs-ano... was something I found via a search that explains some of the nuance without writing a new post on the topic, other citations and resources are welcome.

      (it should be expected that newer, utility ran instant payment systems cannibalize existing, more expensive, lower speed payment rails; going fast and being cheap as a utility is the innovation)

      • smnrchrds 24 minutes ago
        Has FedNow had any visible effect in the US? Are bill payments and bank to bank transfers now happening instantaneously?
        • toomuchtodo 23 minutes ago
          ~$800B/year in annual volume run rate, as of this comment. You can move up to $10M per value message for less than 5 cents, with a max 20 second time to completion SLA.

          https://www.frbservices.org/resources/financial-services/fed...

          (i am contributing subject matter expertise to policymakers to make offering FedNow rails to financial services customers a requirement of having a banking license, so I'm a bit biased; this is the only way we'll get off of closed payment rails like Zelle, slow open rails like ACH, or expensive faster legacy credit card rails)

          > Are bill payments and bank to bank transfers now happening instantaneously?

          Walmart is currently rolling it out. I expect others to start to as you see them surcharge credit card payments (US mobile phone providers, internet providers, etc). It's trivial to build into an app experience, with or without a partner like Plaid (for example).

          > “It surprised me,” Henry said of adoption of Walmart’s first iteration of pay-by-bank, which is available online but hasn’t been marketed to customers. “It’s certainly surpassed our expectations of the amount of customers that have registered and actually use the payment type.”

          > Walmart’s upgraded pay-by-bank offering will be rolled out in 2025. The transactions will occur over bank technology provider Fiserv’s NOW Network, which integrates with The Clearing House’s Real Time Payments network and the Federal Reserve’s FedNow. Until now, large retailers hesitated to launch real time payment options because many banks were not connected to an instant settlement system, meaning their customers would not be able to use the product. NOW Network aims to connect to as many banks as possible to reach 100% of deposit accounts by combining its own network with RTP and FedNow.

          Walmart Plans Instant Bank Payments, Cutting Out Card Networks - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41593450 - September 2024 (3 comments)

          https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49632105 (additional citations)

          https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49433164 (additional citations)

          • smnrchrds 18 minutes ago
            Has this lead to any user-visible changes? Like, can you pay your bills on the due date now instead of a couple of business days earlier, not having to worry about it arriving on time?
            • toomuchtodo 16 minutes ago
              The most visible change I've seen is that I can move funds instantly between my credit union (which I maintain solely for Zelle access at this time in my financial system) and Wise, for free, others would have to chime in for more pireps/ground truth on this which apps are getting this value in front of users.
          • dcrazy 20 minutes ago
            Is ~800B a lot? It doesn’t sound like a lot in the context of the U.S. economy.
            • toomuchtodo 16 minutes ago
              Draw your attention to YoY upward volume trajectory in my first citation in the comment you replied to. It is still "warming up." TAM is all existing check, ACH, Zelle, and credit card volume. Takes time for folks to get the warm fuzzies and migrate to new systems.

              The faster merchants offer instant payments for making payments for free and surcharge credit card rails for payments (to cover the exorbitant cost), the faster volume moves over (imho).

              Brazil's Pix (https://whatispix.com/) is what desired target end state looks like imho.

              Brazil's Pix payment system faces pressure from Visa and Mastercard - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48052371 - May 2026 (383 comments)

  • julianlam 32 minutes ago
    Interac (eTransfer/EMT) is a great system that has already rolled out nation-wide.

    Unfortunately its utility is curtailed severely if your bank doesn't trust your mobile OS (LineageOS, for me). For security purposes, my bank (RBC) triggers identity checks every time I try to send an EMT, and even after sending selfies, drivers licences, etc. — it still rejects the transfer.

    So, security at the cost of all utility.

    I have now resorted to transferring money between my accounts using paper cheques... like it's the 90s. If somehow they deny me cheque deposits I'll have to use an ATM and walk the money to the other bank. Given how there are now banks that don't even have branches, this could be a major problem in the future.

    This Real-Time Rail system sounds promising, but that's not the link that'll kill it for everyone.

    • T-RN-R 17 minutes ago
      99.999% of people don’t root and install custom operating systems on consumer hardware. The bank derives immense security value by enforcing this, at the expense of your hobby installation.
      • switchbak 7 minutes ago
        Yeah what did you need that freedom for anyway?
    • dcrazy 26 minutes ago
      The utility is preventing malware bundled with pirated apps from transferring away your personal savings in a hard-to-reverse instant transfer.

      You, as a technically savvy user, could choose to use a dedicated device with an acceptable security posture for your electronic transfers.

    • metalman 1 minute ago
      Bieng in a similar situation, my back up plan has been to keep a phone that is used exclusivly for personal banking and pull the sim and shut it off when not in use. Currently I have a much fiddled with android phone and a browser that will interact with the banks web sites for banking. I get a lot of paper cheques and convert to cash for much of my personal spending, and my hope is that the new system will facilitate timely clearance of paper cheques and actualy make them more atractive.
    • gpm 20 minutes ago
      Weird... I've never had problems using eTransfer from a browser (firefox) on my computer (linux)... which has got to be as untrustworthy a device as there is.
      • abdullahkhalids 4 minutes ago
        Similar experience. RBC limits the amount I can transfer to 2k per day from browser and like 5k per day from the app.

        I don't send anything from TD, but if I buy anything online half the time it forces a 2FA which requires signing into the app and confirming the transaction. I imagine signing into the app might not work nicely if I was on LineageOS.

    • kevin_nisbet 18 minutes ago
      Unless I'm missing something I'd expect Payments Canada to have similar issues for you, since it'll still be the banks that you interact with. What changes is the settlement and messaging system between the banks.
    • fl4regun 13 minutes ago
      can't you just use the web interface?
  • rvz 11 minutes ago
    So FedNow for Canada, meaning you can't use this outside of Canada at all.

    Crypto blockchains like Solana, XRP, Stellar and Tempo on the other hand can be used anywhere worldwide, 24/7 and sends stablecoins like USDC in seconds with extremely low fees.

    • petcat 5 minutes ago
      Crypto blockchains are useless for these kinds of transactions because in the real world people make mistakes, get scammed, or myriad other things that requires a transaction to be reversed.
    • greyw 3 minutes ago
      As understand it, these mechanisms do not help in the case of fraud or disputes. No way to reverse transactions.
  • coevcan 11 minutes ago
    I don't know why anyone would trust the Liberal government with a payment system, after they went rogue and froze about 200 bank accounts without court orders during the convey protests using the emergencies act which has since been deemed illegal.

    > Using powers granted under the Emergencies Act, the federal government has directed banks and other financial institutions to stop doing business with people associated with the anti-vaccine mandate convoy occupying the nation's capital.

    > ... financial institutions are required to monitor and halt all transactions that funnel money to demonstrators — a measure designed to cut off funding to a well-financed protest ...

    If you think they wouldnt abuse this, good luck to you.

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/emergencies-act-banks-ottaw...

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/emergency-bank-measures-fin...

    https://reclaimthenet.org/court-rules-trudeau-freezing-civil...

    • ravetcofx 2 minutes ago
      While it may have been since deemed illegal, they found a few of those trucks to be armed to brim with munitions. It was strong reaction to try and prevent a violent insurrection on Parliament Hill, which was still fresh on many Canadians minds from Jan 6.
    • mmooss 0 minutes ago
      > why anyone would trust the Liberal government ... after they ... froze about 200 bank accounts ... during the convey protests

      Wasn't that almost 5 years ago - was it the same government? Is there reason to believe it's the Liberals and not the prime minister at the time, or that the Conservatives would be different?

  • bryanlarsen 22 minutes ago
    [flagged]
    • everfree 19 minutes ago
      Included soon, from the article:

      > With additional participants onboarding continually in the coming months, including all major Canadian financial institutions and other members applying for access, the RTR will be available to more than nine in 10 Canadians within the first year after launch.