I refuse to let SPICE die

(github.com)

33 points | by Nefarius 3 hours ago

10 comments

  • IndrekR 30 minutes ago
    Major confusion for me, as SPICE is well known circuit simulator: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SPICE

    Using it often. Mostly via ngspice nowadays: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ngspice

    • chrisandchris 25 minutes ago
      People who work with virtualization on Linux will (hopefully) all know what SPICE is.

      Edit: typo

      • IndrekR 21 minutes ago
        > with visualization on Linux

        You mean ‘virtualization’ here, I guess.

    • kazinator 20 minutes ago
      I would never call a software project SPICE; I use a fucking search engine when naming things to avoid the cringe of ignorantly landing on a dupe. (And also use SPICE in the LTSpice incarnation; I should give ngspice a spin one of these days.)
  • c0l0 46 minutes ago
    As an irregular user of spice (via Proxmox PVE), I wish the stars would align for QEMU to gain support for sunlight/moonlight streaming directly in the hypervisor. That'd be a killer app for VDI-style infrastructure, now that accelerated guest graphics via Venus, VirtIO GPU, and Intel's support for SR-IOV is finally coming together.
    • matja 26 minutes ago
      > I wish the stars would align for QEMU to gain support for sunlight/moonlight streaming directly in the hypervisor.

      I didn't know I wanted it until you said it.

      I have a few QEMU VMs where I use PCI-passthrough of a whole GPU and a USB controller, and wire the display and USB outputs physically into a KVM switch - works great, but not having to fiddle with the KVM (and run out of physical ports) would be - indeed, killer app.

  • franga2000 46 minutes ago
    I really don't get why redhat decided to kill SPICE. It was the only thing that got using a VM on open source virtualization (e.g. proxmox) close to the experience of using one on vmware.

    VNC is truly the worst remote desktop protocol you can have. Bad latency, bad quality, bad integration.

    • x3haloed 26 minutes ago
      Now that NoMachine 10 has no free option, I’ve decided that I should try to burn some tokens on making a good, performant remote desktop system. I’m targeting moonlight-like performance with Windows RDP-like user experience. Cross-platform.

      https://github.com/x3haloed/ascry

      I don’t need my particular repo to be the one where this gets solved, but now that coding agents are really good, we shouldn’t have to put up with paying for shit software anymore, IMO.

    • rwmj 16 minutes ago
      Not enough people want to pay for VDI basically, certainly compared to how much it costs to maintain it. SPICE at the time that we abandoned it "only" supported 2D and video compression, which is complicated enough, but everyone wanted 3D support which would have added another labyrinthine stack on top.

      Also the code at the time was a massive security nightmare, written with no validation of fields in the network protocol. It was unmarshalling stuff off the network and sending it directly to X11 libs without even bounds checking. (I sincerely hope this has improved.)

      With that said, I wish the project well. SPICE is a much better user experience than VNC.

    • Tostino 32 minutes ago
      I did all of my development for a couple years on my first startup in a VM on my proxmox server, connected through spice. Was extremely nice being able to just go from desktop to laptop to any other machine that I had available and have the same environment available everywhere.

      It's been a few years and I haven't had a need for it recently, but it's sad to hear that they stopped supporting it.

    • g8oz 32 minutes ago
      100% agree. VNC is well past its prime.
  • danilocesar 3 minutes ago
    The major challenge is not keep it building and compatible. The major challenge is to keep up with security issues.

    I wish op all the best, it's a tough journey

  • indigodaddy 10 minutes ago
    I used to use x2goserver which was and still is awesome.

    These days I prefer docker-based KASM Workspaces, or if you just want a nice GUI over your "bare-metal" VM or server then KasmVNC is great and easy to setup (not that KASM Workspaces is hard to setup)

    https://hub.docker.com/r/linuxserver/kasm https://github.com/kasmtech/KasmVNC

  • bityard 17 minutes ago
    I guess I hadn't been paying attention. Is this just the Windows SPICE client that Red Hat has abandoned, or are they moving toward dropping SPICE altogether? Does Red Hat no longer have a VDI product? (I'm sure they did at one point.)

    Regardless, thanks for picking this up, OP.

    • rwmj 12 minutes ago
      Yes, Red Hat dropped SPICE support quite some time ago. Apparently in RHEL 8.3: https://access.redhat.com/solutions/5414901 It's definitely not part of any current Red Hat product. See my other reply for why this is.

      I don't think we have a VDI product as such, assuming you discount VNC which we do support but is hardly a full VDI solution.

  • IshKebab 30 minutes ago
    That is one creepy image.
    • hughes 20 minutes ago
      Yeah - was the brony/furry mascot original to the service or added by OP?
      • DaSHacka 7 minutes ago
        Its the OP's profile picture, edited with a Red Hat fedora.
  • woleium 32 minutes ago
    The lack of a decent SPICE client for mac is disappointing, it’s one if my greatest proxmox frustrations

    Edit: great work on this fork, by the way.

  • krautburglar 5 minutes ago
    redhat spice driver was always touch and go — like every other linux well poisoning they do.

    x11rdp has been good to me.

    • rwmj 1 minute ago
      You mean the closed source code that Red Hat acquired when we bought Qumranet for $100 million, then open sourced, maintained at a loss for many years, and is now (still) open source and available to everyone to use as they wish?
  • woleium 2 minutes ago
    [flagged]