18 comments

  • tinix 3 minutes ago
    > All suspicious activity reported must be behavior based. It is important to keep in mind that suspicious behavior, such as taking photographs or videos, is not a criminal act by itself, but may be a precursor to criminal activity.

      the number of times I've been harassed by police for taking photos... even in small towns in the middle of nowhere people are paranoid.
  • aliasxneo 53 minutes ago
    > For instance, the Church of Scientology, U.S. Navy, and the Washington State Military Department told Prism that they are no longer working with the network.

    That first one took me by surprise. What a random hodgepodge of organizations.

    • giancarlostoro 51 minutes ago
      4chan validated in their protests against Scientology was not in my bingo card.
      • marcosdumay 30 minutes ago
        At this point I'm waiting for the aliens appearance in the Epstein files.
        • psychoslave 6 minutes ago
          Such a low level of expectation of ethical level for non human beings is not fair.
    • QuercusMax 51 minutes ago
      Scientologists being involved with intelligence agencies doesn't surprise me even a bit, it makes a lot of sense as a CIA cutout.
      • futuraperdita 46 minutes ago
        Infiltration of government institutions has been doctrine for the group since the 1970s: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Snow_White
      • Deprogrammer9 11 minutes ago
        Those weirdos followed me around Ybor near Tampa when I said something negative about them online in public. IT WAS WEIRD! But I gave no Fs
      • acidhousemcnab 32 minutes ago
        Any belief system or club that validates sociopathy as a "higher" state of evolution or enlightenment will worm it's way into intelligence agencies.
      • joe_the_user 10 minutes ago
        It seems likely that every tightly clique is trying to infiltrate every other such clique - it's endless battle between mafias, political parties, cults (Tulsi Gabard's connections to Krishna cult), intelligence agencies and so-forth, each trying to use the other.

        But naturally, there significant limits on how much and how long each of infiltration be effective. A infiltrator from X sent to gain control of Y and gaining complete control there of will often identify with Y since leading it give them more power (Stalin was likely a agent of the Czarist secret police before the revolution but he probably wasn't taking orders from them in 1935 etc).

    • coliveira 44 minutes ago
      Scientology is essentially a scheme to get private/incriminating information from very important people. Why the surprise?
      • colechristensen 35 minutes ago
        Scientology is what happens when a science fiction writer acts out a dystopian plot in real life instead of writing a novel.

        Read Stranger in a Strange Land, read about Hubbard and Heinlein's friendship, and look at the timeline of when Scientology started and Stranger in a Strange Land was published.

      • sysguest 33 minutes ago
        damn I wonder how many scientology believers in intel actually believe in scientology...

        I mean, it shows how much intel agencies can "screen for high intelligence individuals" ?

        • sidewndr46 9 minutes ago
          people believe in scientology as much as they believe in a literature club. If you listen to someone like Tom Cruise's statements he says "I have gotten to where I am today because of Scientology". He doesn't name off specific procedures, treatments, practices, etc. Partially because they are barred from naming them.

          But if you're looking for a club you can advance it, I highly suspect Scientology is as quid pro quo as anything else out there. In other words, it's more of a social function than a religion.

          • psychoslave 3 minutes ago
            Religion is all about social function, at least from social science perceptives I guess.
  • whimsicalism 13 minutes ago
    Edited title to be more sensationalist - this is a Seattle local thing

    > The Seattle Shield website states that its mission “is to provide a collaborative and information-sharing environment between the Seattle Police Department and public/private partners in the Seattle area. Seattle Shield members assist Seattle Police Department efforts to identify, deter, defeat or mitigate potential acts of terrorism by reporting suspicious activity in a timely manner.”

    • jedahan 6 minutes ago
      That network is shared with police departments in cities outside Seattle per the article.
    • shevy-java 7 minutes ago
      You have Trump. You see how he is surrounded by the superrich.

      You have Palantir.

      You still think this is "sensationalist"? I don't think so. The assumption here is that you wish to isolate this onto Seattle only. I think this is global instead. By focusing only on Seattle we lose the wider picture. Anyone remembers how people were surprised that Facebook connects offline-data to accounts? It's why they are more accurately called Spybook.

      • whimsicalism 5 minutes ago
        Interesting. You should write an article about this and post it on HN. This article is about an unfunded website run by someone at the Seattle PD.
  • jedahan 4 minutes ago
    Reminder if you work for any of these companies (not unlikely on this site) you are actively enabling this. If your first reaction is doubt, deflection, rationalization or discomfort, there are ways out.
  • zuzululu 4 minutes ago
    How bad are things in Seattle that they are resorting to this? What the hell happened to my hometown?
  • ensen 55 minutes ago
    archive that won't hijack your back button https://archive.is/Td9AR
    • andrybak 9 minutes ago
      archive.is is one of the domains of archive.today, which used its end users for a DDOS attack on a blog. This caused English Wikipedia to deprecate it with the end goal of blacklisting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Archive.today_guidan...
    • Cider9986 14 minutes ago
      Huh, it seems to try to take my back button and it pretends that there is history if I open it in a new tab, but if I click on it from HN it lets me go back. But I can also see it trying to create history. Maybe it's a Brave feature idk.
    • PcChip 25 minutes ago
      Why do our browsers even allow that?
      • herpdyderp 21 minutes ago
        When done properly you don't even notice! It is very beneficial when needed. But, as we know, very awful when done improperly.
      • sheept 23 minutes ago
        For websites like Gmail when you open an email
      • hkt 16 minutes ago
        To enable JavaScript crapware
  • codezero 34 minutes ago
    Have a look at your local branch here: https://globalshieldnetwork.com/programs-2/
  • rc_kas 16 minutes ago
    Where is the "I did that" sticker with trump pointing at this article.

    :(

    • 1234letshaveatw 10 minutes ago
      established and operating since 2009- "Why did Trump do this?"
  • booleandilemma 23 minutes ago
    Having a coalition of mega corporations all allied with each other isn't any better than having a strong government. Both are dangerous to personal liberties. I think we're due for a break up of these companies. No more Amazon, Google, Facebook, etc. We the people need to start taking power back.
    • verdverm 6 minutes ago
      No one is going to save us. I've recently been moved to direct action and started participating in a local indivisible.org group. It's had untold positive impacts on my personal mental state being with people trying to make things better, or at least slow the damage for now. Much of that is from going out and talking to random people on the street, handing out information and having conversations. Also quitting social media at the same time, save one exception for HN.

      https://indivisible.org/get-involved/find-a-group/

  • shermantanktop 49 minutes ago
    Looks like a nothingburger? It's unfunded. An email describes a protest without giving a framing that the site would prefer. Then it turns out that nobody knows what it does, but it might do something bad.

    I'm all for transparency and accountability but my assumption is that the bad things being done by LEO and intelligence are far worse than this.

    • Shalomboy 44 minutes ago
      My take away from the article was that this likely isn't the only public-private intelligence network propped up by local PDs; that was pretty alarming to me.
      • lacewing 13 minutes ago
        Would it shock your conscience to learn that Microsoft security operations probably have contacts with the Redmond PD and that they occasionally discuss concerns?

        The existence of a mailing list or something of that sort isn't particularly worrying. I don't think it's reasonable to expect a firewall between police departments and local businesses any more that it would be reasonable to expect one between PDs and local residents.

        I would be alarmed if it turned out that Amazon was giving the Seattle PD direct, warrantless access to data about their consumers, or something like that. But there's no evidence presented here of anything particularly sketchy going on.

      • whimsicalism 12 minutes ago
        Yes, large businesses have contacts with local PD in the area. This is what BIDs basically are as well
      • erxam 41 minutes ago
        I think this is a good point: this is what they're letting us on.
      • nikhilpareek13 30 minutes ago
        [dead]
    • LoganDark 42 minutes ago
      Do you mean unfounded?
    • acidhousemcnab 39 minutes ago
      There were a lot of articles describing Snowdon / Manning and Wikileaks releases as exactly "nothing burgers", in those journals of note that people read to tell them what to think about matters - but I'm not sure what a "nothing burger" means - pulverised cattle flesh flattened into an oval, that doesn't exist?
  • ethagnawl 8 minutes ago
    Please tell me they're using Workplace.
  • kittikitti 44 minutes ago
    As an American, I genuinely trust my data with China more than I do with the United States.
    • organsnyder 11 minutes ago
      That's actually a very logical stance: China is much less interested in what you're doing as an individual citizen—and much less able to act on what they know—than the United States is. For the same reason, Chinese citizens should trust the United States with their data more than China.
  • shevy-java 9 minutes ago
    Not so surprising - we kind of suspected this. Anyone remembers Snowden or Assange?

    We have to accept the fact that presently all democracies are merely simulation of a democracy. At the least in the USA; other countries may be a bit better, e. g. Switzerland or the scandinavian countries are somewhat better (though also not to be trusted - see how Sweden pursued Assange).

    Perhaps this is how things always end? Democracies are kind of like an obsolete model when you compare it to authoritarianism (assuming the USA would still be a democracy rather than a tech-corporate-fascist country run by a corrupt elite of superrich).

  • sidcool 24 minutes ago
    I'm convinced Meta is a cult with Total control. It will go to any lengths to make money.
  • root-parent 53 minutes ago
    • acidhousemcnab 34 minutes ago
      What in the decomposed-dissident gang-stalked tarnation is this?
  • bigbuppo 51 minutes ago
    So what you're saying is that everyone that works at Amazon and Facebook are now at grave risk because the bad guys now think they're informants?
    • erxam 42 minutes ago
      You've got the good guys and the bad guys mixed up. No Meta "engineer" knows what morals or ethics even are, much less actually apply them in real life.
      • srameshc 33 minutes ago
        I love this comment, I just couldn't ever frame it so well :)
    • GolfPopper 44 minutes ago
      Not any more than the average citizen of East Germany.
    • kgwxd 41 minutes ago
      It's bad guys all the way down.
  • markus_zhang 55 minutes ago
    Ah the new dark pool. Does anyone remember those from the trading? I still remember ARCA (good rebate back in the day), ECN (very fluid and very cheap), and a few dark pools that I used to get out of a trade quickly.