The Palantir app helping ICE raids in Minneapolis

(404media.co)

336 points | by fajmccain 1 hour ago

36 comments

  • andrewvc 1 hour ago
    For an idea as to how this gets translated into the reality on the ground here in Minneapolis this is an article on what’s going on from the main newspaper in the state.

    > In the past week alone, ICE boxed in a Woodbury real estate agent recording their movements from his car, slammed him to the ground and detained him at the Whipple Federal Building near Fort Snelling for 10 hours. A 51-year-old teacher patrolling the Nokomis East community told the Star Tribune she was run off the road into a snowbank by ICE for laying on her horn. Officers shattered the car window of a woman attempting to drive past a raid in south Minneapolis to get to a doctor’s appointment nearby, then carried her through the street. Feds pushed an unidentified motorist through a red light into a busy intersection, reportedly fired projectiles at a pedestrian walking “too slowly” in a crosswalk and shoved Minneapolis City Council President Elliott Payne while he was observing their actions from a public sidewalk.

    You can read the full thing here: https://www.startribune.com/have-yall-not-learned-federal-ag...

    • nutjob2 1 hour ago
      [flagged]
      • throw0101d 47 minutes ago
        Some folks have observed that the Proud Boys, Oath Keepers, and other established far-right groups aren't marching as much recently:

        > “How many pardoned January 6th insurrectionists have been hired by your respective departments?” Raskin (D-Md.), ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee, asked the two officials [Bondi and Noem].

        * https://www.commondreams.org/news/ice-agents-january-6

      • dukeofdoom 28 minutes ago
        [flagged]
        • sureglymop 14 minutes ago
          > "illegal"

          If legality is where one draws the line, faith in the united states would be considered long dead.

        • AndrewKemendo 19 minutes ago
          [flagged]
          • mc32 6 minutes ago
            Are there countries where people of any other country can enter without controls outside of those who form a union to control ingress from non-union members?

            Like can I just get a plane ticket and stay indefinitely in Peru, Russia, UK, Cuba, Mexico, Ukraine, Uganda, Abu Dhabi, Costa Rica, India, etc?

            • rpjt 1 minute ago
              Nope. You cannot.
            • AndrewKemendo 2 minutes ago
              What the hell does that have to do with anything?

              Just because a bunch of people jumped off a bridge means you’re gonna do the same thing?

              I would literally never look to Russia as an example of anything to emulate so why would I give a shit what they do?

      • dpkirchner 48 minutes ago
        [flagged]
    • GenerocUsername 55 minutes ago
      [flagged]
      • lokar 55 minutes ago
        Waving signs, yelling and filming is not obstruction
        • Izkata 51 minutes ago
          [flagged]
          • irl_zebra 50 minutes ago
            Slamming people into the ground, firing tear gas canisters into their faces, or killing them are not valid remedies for the state to take even if obstruction is happening. (even if they're being like really annoying with whistles and stuff!)

            edit: even if they referred to the ICE agent as "fatty fat fat fat" meanly

            • NonHyloMorph 28 minutes ago
              Lol. Seems necessary to be pointed out which is a low point really.
          • banannaise 34 minutes ago
            "Blocking traffic" is at this point a tired trope. Any sort of disruptive action is described as "blocking traffic", which is somehow framed as a form of violence. (My favorite version is when people argue that it is a form of unlawful detention akin to kidnapping.)

            This would be more accurately framed as "parking illegally", which is the sort of thing for which you occasionally get a ticket placed under your windshield wiper, not the sort of thing for which armed, masked agents violently arrest you.

            • newfriend 10 minutes ago
              Purposely moving your car in front of law enforcement officers' cars to prevent them from arresting a suspect is in fact obstruction. This is not "violence", but you will be arrested if you do this. If you resist arrest, you will be forcefully arrested/apprehended. If you then attempt potentially life-threatening physical harm to the officer you will likely be met with deadly force.
          • mattnewton 28 minutes ago
            Please think more deeply about the consequences here. Besides even the first amendment’s right to assembly, these videos show just people driving by.
          • codezero 21 minutes ago
            They can use their maps program to find another route.
          • fzeroracer 48 minutes ago
            Do these [1] look like blocking traffic?

            [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46598192

            • wahnfrieden 27 minutes ago
              They will claim that if the person was in front of the car when ICE rammed into them, it means they were blocking the car
    • shrubble 46 minutes ago
      [flagged]
      • andrewvc 43 minutes ago
        I’m here in the ground, I’ve seen them detain people for no cause. Masked agents grabbing guys out of a Home Depot parking lot and throwing them in a van only to drop them off later after scaring them. No charges.

        Maybe you’ll be lucky enough to get picked up so you can get your proof.

        • fzeroracer 33 minutes ago
          I hope you stay safe and avoid getting assaulted by those fascist assholes. I've seen a lot of grim stuff already just from my own network of friends and the videos pouring out of there.
        • shrubble 32 minutes ago
          [flagged]
          • datsci_est_2015 25 minutes ago
            The amount of credulity you’re exhibiting is incredible given the tidal wave of evidence that there’s a highly politicized, highly funded paramilitary organization of the government that has to date not been publicly held accountable for any of its actions that clearly violate the rights and safety of even the lawful residents of the United States.
      • watwut 33 minutes ago
        > she was clearly deliberately obstructing traffic,

        You are lying. She waited for the pedestrian to cross.

        Also, obstructing traffic is not valid reason to be violent against someone. ICE or cops being violent in that situation is them abusing their power big time. So, again, we are back to Brownshirts comparison.

        • ryandrake 3 minutes ago
          These guys always fall back on "bbbbut Obstructing Traffic!" as if that's a capital offense.
        • shrubble 20 minutes ago
          Please post a link to the video you viewed.

          That way we can be sure that we’re discussing the same thing.

          • wat10000 1 minute ago
            Just go watch the one that starts with a car driving past her car.
        • newfriend 8 minutes ago
          Obstructing justice, and then refusing to comply / resisting arrest will lead to you being forcefully removed. This is in fact a valid reason.
      • justonceokay 43 minutes ago
        Yeah probably is all just made up seems like good guys /s
    • gradus_ad 32 minutes ago
      [flagged]
    • brightball 29 minutes ago
      Is there video for any of that?
    • framenotre 11 minutes ago
      Fake news, what's a teacher doing "patrolling" WTF get out and teach.
      • LastTrain 9 minutes ago
        ^ This troll apparently likes federal law enforcement wearing masks.
  • chinathrow 57 minutes ago
    If you work for Palantir and if you work on these systems: You have blood on your hands. You know that it's not right what is happening on the ground right now. Do something.
    • pixl97 47 minutes ago
      The particular problem here is the vast majority of people that are writing this software

      1. Don't care, blood is great.

      2. Think they are the good guys.

      3. Are more worried about their next paycheck and having bad things happen to them related to not paying rent.

      • no-dr-onboard 11 minutes ago
        I'd like to invite you to prove any three of your points.
        • speff 3 minutes ago
          It’s hard to prove without knowing the app devs, but for points 1 & maybe 2, we can look at whether Americans think the raids are justified.

          28% of them think they are [0]. It wouldn’t be out of the realm of possibility that the devs would be part of that number

          [0]: https://x.com/YouGovAmerica/status/2010853750618063016

      • GuinansEyebrows 31 minutes ago
        > 3. Are more worried about their next paycheck and having bad things happen to them related to not paying rent.

        i feel like a broken record: anyone with a resume good enough for Palantir would have no problem finding work for another company/public sector employer. but they stay.

      • hobs 44 minutes ago
        Yes, Palantir folks have self selected for the first two over and over - anyone working there for many years now is completely blacklisted from anything I touch, when someone advertises ex-Palantir folks in the job description I know I can safely avoid that company forever.
        • lokar 18 minutes ago
          I would never allow one of them to be hired via any hiring process I have influence over.
    • 10xDev 39 minutes ago
      PLTR stock peaked at $200 last year and has been going back up so far this year. People are investing in CCP style tech and don't care.
      • CapricornNoble 35 minutes ago
        A Palantir rep was supporting one of our exercises late last summer, and he said "Knowing what I know about how the military is going all-in on Maven....I recommend buying Palantir stock."

        I picked up a few shares, but I haven't checked if Palantir's growth has been unique or part of a general military-industrial complex melt-up.

        • drcongo 29 minutes ago
          Free blood money.
          • CapricornNoble 21 minutes ago
            Nah, free blood money was when my General Dynamics shares went from $60->$120, then did a stock split and went from $60-> ~$100. I think that was in....2005? The Stryker (a GD product) was coming into service in Iraq, which drove my purchasing decision. I was an E-4 in Korea at the time and thought I was a defense stock-picking genius.
    • DetectDefect 23 minutes ago
      Palantir does not work in a vacuum - it requires other technology, platforms and systems to operate and succeed - many of which are designed and maintained by the users of Hacker News.

      Take a look at Palantir's trust center: https://palantir.safebase.us

      Schellman did their audit and compliance - do they have blood on their hands?

      How about AWS, GCP, Azure cloud resources used by Palantir - are they stained, too?

      • clpwn 13 minutes ago
        Certainly you must be aware that there are not just binary values of morality in life. The obvious answer is yes they are stained, as we all are through our participation in various systems, but with vastly varying amounts.

        Is the manufacturer of the bomb responsible for when Israel drops it on a family home in Gaza? Yes. Is it the same responsibility as the general who gave the order? No. Is it the same as the pilot who followed the order? No.

        Does that make it useless to hold people accountable? Of course not.

      • LargeWu 16 minutes ago
        Palantir is built explicitly for surveillance, in a way the other companies you listed are not. There is no comparison here. It's like saying the City of Minneapolis is complicit because they maintain the roads ICE is driving on.
      • AlotOfReading 11 minutes ago
        The ironworker making steel plates for tanks and ships has a hell of a lot less moral culpability than the engineer designing shells.
      • shrikant 9 minutes ago
        > If you work in technology, you are part of this force, whether you like it or not.

        Disappointing to see you downvoted. I agree with this partially, but only because I think it applies more broadly.

        I work in tech (although not in Big Tech/Mag 7/FAANG/whatever they're called now), and I feel quite acutely that anyone in the field is culpable in part for the enabling the absolutely massive dump that the capital-adjacent class is taking on the world to have their power play fantasies play out.

        To the extent that I've started apologising on behalf of the field/profession to non-technical folks when they complain about yet another dark pattern/"growth hack" designed to steal their attention and money.

      • dawnerd 18 minutes ago
        You can’t minimize the damage Palantir is doing with simple whataboutism.
        • DetectDefect 12 minutes ago
          It is in fact the contrary: I am trying to maximize it by pointing out how big tech platforms makes it possible.
    • jonnybgood 32 minutes ago
      The US gov (including ICE) uses all of Microsoft Office for coordination and planning: email, spreadsheets, powerpoint, document generation, etc. Would you say Microsoft employees have blood on their hands too? If not, what makes Microsoft different?
      • benrutter 29 minutes ago
        From the article for context:

        > Palantir is working on a tool for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) that populates a map with potential deportation targets, brings up a dossier on each person, and provides a “confidence score” on the person’s current address

        So essentially, the relevant app here is custom built in order to help ICE raids.

        That's substantially different from generic office tech where ICE happen to be one of millions of users.

      • miniBill 30 minutes ago
        The same difference between a kitchen knife and an AK 47
      • biophysboy 16 minutes ago
        Taking your argument in good faith: I think selling a tool with a narrow use case tailor-made for ICE is categorically different.
      • Zetaphor 15 minutes ago
        Considering that Microsoft is also providing services to the Israeli government with the explicit intent of storing and cataloging all of the phone calls made by Palestinian citizens so that they can be analyzed by AI for potential bombing targets...yes I would say Microsoft also has blood on their hands. I wouldn't be surprised to learn they have deep partnerships with Palantir for compute services.
      • vimda 18 minutes ago
        Office can be used for things that aren't objectively evil?
        • amunozo 2 minutes ago
          Maybe, but Office is evil itself.
        • small_scombrus 6 minutes ago
          All things done with office must be evil by association.

          (Except clippy, he's just a guy)

      • chinathrow 28 minutes ago
        Whataboutism, much?
      • Feldwaffel 29 minutes ago
        [flagged]
    • luxuryballs 5 minutes ago
      Wouldn’t it be even more fair to say that the people who allowed or even encouraged illegal immigration have blood on their hands because they know what they were doing and how the government would have to respond under the law? If we are going to use the line of reasoning you suggest then this should easily be on the table also.
    • haritha-j 19 minutes ago
      In general, if you're working for Palantir, you're unlikely to find yourself in the right side of history. Whenever you hear of tech being used for questionable purposes, Palantir seems to have their fingers deep in the pie.
    • libraryatnight 40 minutes ago
      I assume if someone works for Palantir they're an unabashed Yarvinist and fine with it.
      • no-dr-onboard 24 minutes ago
        That's a pretty broad generalization, but OK I'll bite.

        - I think Yarvin has a lot of good points. No one should be ashamed to admit the truth of a matter. I can't stand his voice, I think he has annoying mannerisms, but nonetheless the man has a point and I'm not ashamed (especially by unknown and strange online personas) to say so.

        - Palantir is objectively a profitable job. I've learned a lot here and the people I work with are brilliant.

        - I don't think I have "blood on my hands" and rather instead think that people who use that tactic are resorting to strange emotional manipulation in place of a salient argument.

        Let's be honest, simply conjecturing that someone ascribes to a political view isn't discourse. It's a potshot. You're assuming that anyone who reads your comment and leans in your direction is going to agree and vote with you. This is literally the lowest and cheapest form of engagement. It's also the most self serving. It does nothing to advance the conversation or prove your point.

        Most importantly, this is the exact type of behavior that is furthering political polarization and discouraging actual discourse.

        Really shows the state of things right now tbh.

        • disgruntledphd2 4 minutes ago
          I'm vouching for this comment (even though I disagree with it) as it's important to hear dissenting views.
    • webdoodle 24 minutes ago
      Hopefully John Connor is one of them. Deeply embedded, slowly implanting backdoors and kill switches into the Skynet system they are building.
  • DoingIsLearning 9 minutes ago
    Worth reminding everyone in the EU and UK that this is not a 'them' problem.

    Palantir is the main software vendor for Europol. Equally pretty much all the 1984 proposals for age or id online verification that are being massaged into existence (both in the UK and pushed by the European Commission) have their fingers all over them.

    They sell pre-crime and opinion control to our democratic leaders and apparently everyone in Davos loves it.

  • Sparkle-san 1 hour ago
    The Palantro CEO, Alex Karp, is on the record that he approves of what the president is doing in regards to immigration enforcement and the striking of boats in international waters.
    • browningstreet 46 minutes ago
      "The Palantir CEO is currently the 142nd richest man in the world, with an estimated net worth of $18.2 billion..."

      https://www.realtor.com/news/celebrity-real-estate/alex-karp...

    • tempodox 31 minutes ago
      Terrorizing everyone indiscriminately is not immigration enforcement.
    • ironbound 44 minutes ago
      900 million in federal contracts this year will do that
    • 10xDev 57 minutes ago
      This type of behaviour from Palantir is old news: https://www.business-humanrights.org/es/%C3%BAltimas-noticia...
    • mingus88 56 minutes ago
      And in 2016 he was a Clinton supporter and a self described progressive. Vance was also a never trumper by his own admission.

      It’s quite clear to me that these elites are just grabbing power by any means necessary. It won’t end after Trump. He’s just providing the cover in the current moment.

      • no-dr-onboard 23 minutes ago
        [flagged]
      • lokar 53 minutes ago
        When the transition to authoritarianism starts elites have a choice to make.

        History show most will choose authoritarianism.

        • throwaway85825 46 minutes ago
          Larry Ellison wants constant surveillance so everyone will be 'on their best behavior'.
          • ceejayoz 38 minutes ago
            With a little asterisk on the word "everyone".
            • throwaway85825 37 minutes ago
              Some animals are more equal than others after all.
    • nutjob2 52 minutes ago
      Why would he object to illegal acts by the US when they are so profitable.
      • libraryatnight 38 minutes ago
        We need to expect more from our business leaders.
        • ambicapter 31 minutes ago
          They have more power than you. The only way to induce accountability is to reduce the power gap.
          • wahnfrieden 16 minutes ago
            These people want lords who they can petition for charity
        • plorg 5 minutes ago
          Palantir would be evil even if Karp was, like, woke or something.
        • GuinansEyebrows 29 minutes ago
          i don't think we can expect that. but we should demand, require and enforce it.
  • oxqbldpxo 1 hour ago
    And ppl were worried about China's 1984 style use of Ai, lol. In the end it was greedy software developers that enable this.
    • xpltr7 6 minutes ago
      Take the word "immigrant" out of the article and replace it with "citizen". Thats the end goal here, trace, track, monitor, control citizens. First they have to pursuade the U.S. citizens to accept this surveillance, thus they create these psyops based on "illegal immigrants" causing "havoc" to stir up anger and emotions in U.S. citizens in order for them to be on board with the raids, "arrests", surveillance, etc. Now, on another note is the darker side hidden in plain sight, produced by Homeland, cia, fbi and Freemasons, is the fact that they are creating these psyops and put their favorite Freemasonic number in every one, 33. 33 being the highest order one can get being a Freemason. If you look at the fake shooting of a character called Ren33 Good, youll see the 33 everywhere. The address was 33 east portland in Minneapolis, the 3300 block, then you have the double Portland Oregon ICE fake shootimg in which a fake "victim" was 33yrs old. Also the state of Oregon is the 33rd state...They link these together in your face but hidden. Also photo of agent in minneapolis of "police" with 33 on door. Oh and the fake renee good was "shot" 3 times. Now, also in a press conference, Jd Vance said the ice officer who "shot" ren33 good was dragged by a car months before and got 33 stiches... its all their theatrical movie productions in line with the news medias. Its like hackers creating fake websites, which people think are their banks etc...based on what seen on screen. This is not one time either, the 33 is in all of them, onè of the most promiment fake shootings was Tennesee trans school fake "shooting" Look into the 33s om that one, too much to list here.
    • stackghost 1 hour ago
      This is what happens when one allows oneself to hide in "safe spaces" (like HN) where there's a "no politics" rule enabling people to hide and avoid being confronted with the ramifications of their actions.

      The entire world runs on technology now. It's all inherently political.

      • LurkandComment 52 minutes ago
        This exactly hits in on the head. You're trying create a forum absent of politics. In fact, you're just enabling one political view over another. This hides social issues and in the end comes back to undermine your pure "technical view". It's not apolitical, it's disassociation from reality.
        • fnimick 48 minutes ago
          Exactly. Declaring that there must be no discussion when confronted with situations in which one party is doing harm to others, is an implicit endorsement of the harms being perpetuated.
      • integralid 20 minutes ago
        Yes, HN is my safe space. I have enough politics in my daily life, I don't need it when I'm with phone in my bed trying to wind down.

        And which politics? American internal politics are foreign and distant to me. How much do you care about my country internal affairs? Probably not much. And it's OK, you can't fix every country in existence, and if you tried to care you would get insane.

        • lokar 16 minutes ago
          Pro-tip: when you see a headline on the main page, you don't have to click on it. Just keep scrolling.
          • disgruntledphd2 2 minutes ago
            While I completely agree in principle, these threads get very very heated so I can kinda see why HN/dang/our reptilian overlords are trying to keep them from becoming a majority of the site (which they easily could be, absent the flagging of these stories).
        • ch2026 7 minutes ago
          It’s no longer politics when they’re abducting and murdering your neighbors.
      • brightball 13 minutes ago
        I'm going to defend the HN "no politics" rule here.

        The reason "no politics" zones exist is because there are enough people going out of their way to shout at everybody, everywhere, in every corner of the internet and enough people are tired of it that they flock to...no politics zones. In real life, a person like that confronts you...you remove yourself from the situation, because that person who can't stop shouting at everybody comes across as nuts.

      • pjc50 35 minutes ago
        You can see in this threat that confronting people with the ramifications of their actions causes them to double down. They'll just come up with more and more justifications of why the victims deserve it. Same as every mass atrocity.
      • hydrogen7800 52 minutes ago
        >"no politics"

        No politics is a privilege that many do not have.

        • fnimick 50 minutes ago
          It's a privilege that many people working in tech have, who then create and populate forums where discussion of that privilege is considered political and therefore forbidden.
        • IncreasePosts 11 minutes ago
          But chatting with absolute strangers about random tech-adjacent topics is an inherently privileged activity. So let's just say the privilege needed to do that is large enough that it also gives you the privilege to not talk about politics.

          "My children are starving. Militants have surrounded our village. But let me pop into HN for a bit and drop my hot take on the San Remo Pasta Measurer."

        • stackghost 48 minutes ago
          Exactly my point
      • dawnerd 14 minutes ago
        There’s a shockingly large amount of the population that doesn’t want politics period. And that’s how we got here.
      • ch2026 8 minutes ago
        HN is cancer. @dang himself is a complicit piece of shit.
      • heraldgeezer 30 minutes ago
        Accounts have literally been praising the Iran islamist government in the thread on that country's internet shutdown.

        It all depends on if you have the right politics or not. (USA bad, West bad, EU bad, China good, Iran good, Commies good)

      • throwaway85825 48 minutes ago
        In reality HN's 'no politics' ends up meaning no unoriginal tribal politics. Which is actually refreshing.
        • stackghost 46 minutes ago
          Think about this:

          Right now, there are people commenting on HN who built software enabling the wholesale violations of the rights of US citizens.

          Right now, there are people commenting on HN who built the systems used at Facebook when they experimented with trying to create "symptoms of depression" in their users by manipulating the feed.

          And so on and so forth.

          But thank goodness we have dang to shield those people from criticism because ItS sO uNoRiGiNaL.

          • throwaway85825 40 minutes ago
            I don't see much moderation of criticism of meta and their employees behavior. Anti authoritarian politics has always been popular on HN. It's only the byzantine team color politics that is moderated.
          • amrocha 23 minutes ago
            I maybe get where you’re coming from, but what’s the solution to the issue you’re proposing? Screening everyone’s resume before allowing them to comment? What about people who work at companies that deal with Palantir at completely different departments (Microsoft and Xbox)? It’s obviously untenable

            It is true that some users here spew vile ideology while hiding behind HN intellectual rhetoric. Then posts that understandably react strongly to that get flagged, and users get banned. I wish it was different, but I’ve made peace with that being a significant percent of the user base here.

            A particular interaction I had comes to mind. A user here boldly and openly proclaimed he discriminated in interviews against people that look different from him, or that are neurodivergent. Actual illegal behaviour that will get you sued in many countries. I reacted strongly and my post got flagged and I received a comment from the moderation team.

            I don’t envy the moderation team though, it’s a tough job.

            • fnimick 13 minutes ago
              > A particular interaction I had comes to mind. A user here boldly and openly proclaimed he discriminated in interviews against people that look different from him, or that are neurodivergent. Actual illegal behaviour that will get you sued in many countries. I reacted strongly and my post got flagged and I received a comment from the moderation team.

              This is the "moderate discourse" problem, where you can express horrendous opinions as long as you are polite, and anyone who reacts emotionally gets criticized instead. You are required to engage these arguments in a detached, logical way as though they have equal intellectual merit, while they advocate for your suffering. This is also why places that enforce moderate discourse tend to become populated with polite fascists.

              • stackghost 2 minutes ago
                > I reacted strongly and my post got flagged and I received a comment from the moderation team.

                Yes the moderators here are 100% part of the problem.

            • stackghost 10 minutes ago
              >I maybe get where you’re coming from, but what’s the solution to the issue you’re proposing?

              Making those people into pariahs, through repeated public shaming, until they stop being wilfully blind to the harms they're perpetuating.

              I am 100% serious.

    • cies 56 minutes ago
      > And ppl were worried about China's 1984 style use of Ai, lol.

      Came here to say the same...

      > In the end it was greedy software developers that enable this.

      Nope. First is a failing govt system (not upholding the constitution) that's enabling this.

      Second it's not the devs but the business men (that are so much in bed in govt that they have become indistinguishable).

      Look, there are software devs (and probably business men) that are equally greedy in, say, Finland/Iceland/etc. But it's not happening there: they simply have a govt that's better for the people at large.

      • praptak 48 minutes ago
        GP didn't say greedy devs caused it, they (we?) are only enabling it.

        Obviously there's always the cop out of "someone else would have done it anyway" but it doesn't really change the (un-)ethical side of your choices. I'm not saying it's black and white either - if the other choice is to leave your kids without proper medical care then it's a different thing than just being intentionally blind to ethics.

    • csmpltn 48 minutes ago
      [flagged]
      • peppersghost93 47 minutes ago
        Has your life gotten worse in any way that can be attributed to people moving to the US?
        • piva00 7 minutes ago
          I can't imagine how, the commenter seems to be German (or at least from a German-speaking country) given their use of the German quotation marks.

          Just another radicalised-by-the-internet person trying to be vile online... The mark of the 2020s.

    • csmpltn 39 minutes ago
      [flagged]
  • joshmn 42 minutes ago
    I've been on the receiving end of federal enforcement (DOJ, high-profile "cybercrime"). When they want you, they don't need a confidence score. There is no quota—they take time to build a case. The existence of these tools tells you this isn't targeted enforcement, it's industrial-scale population processing dressed up in an algorithm.

    I live in Minnesota. This is my backyard.

  • nerdjon 57 minutes ago
    I am all for criticizing and pointing fingers at trump and this entire administration.

    But it does say they have been working with ICE for “years” in the article. What is not really clear to me is was the app made worse recently, was it originally commissioned under trump?

    Nothing about that changes that they should not be working with ICE and they deserve any pressure they get to cut ties. But there is some history here I am very curious about.

    All of that being said, I am concerned about how this will be turned around and used in more than just ICE and targeting everyone. Especially since we can be sure this will be used in largely blue big cities.

    • tencentshill 39 minutes ago
      It was a boring database product in 2011. It expanded in scope over many years, and now has a much larger budget.

      "That changed in the second Trump administration, with Palantir now working on ICE’s deportation efforts."

      https://www.palantir.com/newsroom/press-releases/homeland-se...

      "...Since 2011, Palantir has partnered with HSI"

    • libraryatnight 33 minutes ago
      "I am all for criticizing and pointing fingers at trump and this entire administration"

      I don't believe you or you wouldn't have bothered to muddy the water in the face of repeated violence and dehumanization.

    • lukev 49 minutes ago
      They've definitely using tools like this for a while. It's been true under all administrations, and it's always been a problem. Privacy advocates have been alerting on this for a while.

      Physically attacking citizens takes it to another level.

      It's one thing for tech companies to be complicit in eroding privacy, it's quite another to be complicit in overt fascism.

    • daveguy 48 minutes ago
      ICE is already targeting everyone.
  • mmmlinux 26 minutes ago
    As always, I like to point out that someone here is probably very proud of their work on this.
  • m-hodges 53 minutes ago
    I keep thinking about https://neveragain.tech
    • andruby 41 minutes ago
      3 people from Palantir on that list of signatories
  • nipponese 26 minutes ago
    Can anyone explain a user flow for how a Palantir product enables ICE to go from app launch to ‘target arrested’?
  • ZeroGravitas 2 minutes ago
    It's not really a good ad for their software as they appear to be grabbing brown skinned people at random.
  • honeycrispy 30 minutes ago
    Why is this allowed to reach the front page, but any technical talk relating to the slaughter of Iranians gets quietly removed?
    • Permit 25 minutes ago
      It's possible that different people flag the discussions you're referring to. That said, it looks like there have been ~7 threads with over 100 points on Iran in the last week alone: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=pastWeek&page=0&prefix=tru...

      If anything, it appears that Minnesota/Minneapolis are under-discussed relative to Iran, no?

    • JKCalhoun 22 minutes ago
      Good question. But a lazy parsing of your comment might imply you want this post also flagged.
  • treebeard901 24 minutes ago
    Blue cities should have local citizen backed militias under the control of the mayor.
    • zbentley 13 minutes ago
      How would that be different from current municipal police forces?
    • staplers 13 minutes ago
      The national guard exists for this purpose (state level) but is mostly captured by federal interests.

      Local PD's could in effect do something similar but have shown to back the authoritarian-aligned party.

      Propaganda has aligned nearly every single level of law enforcement to authoritarianism. I can't see a scenario where this is undone.

  • amsterdorn 16 minutes ago
    > “Enhanced Leads Identification & Targeting for Enforcement (ELITE) is a targeting tool designed to improve capabilities for identifying and prioritizing high-value targets

    What constitutes this "high value"? & valuable to who, ICE agents with an itchy trigger finger?

  • datsci_est_2015 21 minutes ago
    Great time to bring up the Imperial Boomerang[1]. My paraphrasing: the weapons and technology that imperial and colonial powers develop or use to control subjugated populations will inevitably be used to also control its own population.

    [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperial_boomerang

  • motbus3 11 minutes ago
    Wasn't there a meme called owl really?
  • trymas 25 minutes ago
    > confidence score

    Is this the new social credit?

  • framenotre 12 minutes ago
    I hate these political posts and those on the wrong side. Illegal is illegal. Out you go. I don't care. I'm buying more Palantir stock. Stay out of our country, and go learing someplace else. Those that don't agree can leave the country too.
  • Kapura 55 minutes ago
    It's crazy that anybody who has read books could learn about the company "Palantir," know where the name comes from, and join it thinking it's anything other than evil.

    The thing is, I know palantir engineers are well paid. Money warps people's brains. It's much easier enable evil if you can go back to a home you own in Silicon Valley.

    • lsenrgkawer 1 minute ago
      No one ever joined palantir thinking they were a good person. You join palantir because you've done enough drugs to believe that "good" and "evil" don't exist and you've "evolved" beyond that. You know, sociopaths.
    • ceejayoz 50 minutes ago
      > know where the name comes from

      This is a wild point to me, yeah.

      The Palantir is literally a cautionary tale on the risks of thinking you can use the enemy's tools without being corrupted by it.

      • CodeMage 45 minutes ago
        I've lost count of people who have read Tolkien's work and never dug deeper than "cool fantasy story" level. I was no different when I read the Lord of the Rings as a teenager. Unlike C. S. Lewis, Tolkien does not shove his message down your throat.
    • oldjim798 50 minutes ago
      I think they know exactly what they were doing with the naming. They were and are absolutely ok with the evil connotations and uses
    • nutjob2 24 minutes ago
      Silicon Valley started with hippies and will end with fascists.
  • biophysboy 1 hour ago
    Per the WSJ, as of January 10th this year, ICE has identified 13 instances of agents firing at or into civilian vehicles, leaving eight people shot with two confirmed dead. Five of those shot were citizens. According to court records, only one of these civilians was armed and never drew his weapon.

    There is a sickness curdling in the dark corners of Silicon Valley. These people need to be humiliated for being the sniveling, authoritarian toads that they are.

    • Sparkle-san 1 hour ago
      There are reports that ICE threw a flash bang into a vehicle last night that contained a father trying to leave with his children to get them to safety.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cbMO7u44LGM

      • BuckRogers 41 minutes ago
        [flagged]
        • ceejayoz 35 minutes ago
          https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43675045 (showdead on)

          > This is really over for anyone who opposes us. The Lord saved Donald Trump from assassination and is using him as His instrument. The cognitive dissonance to continue to resist the Will of God and will of the people which are united, is just pure bitterness of loss and defeat.

          Let's be honest, you aren't gonna believe video, either. It's a matter of literal religious faith for you.

    • wutwutwat 1 hour ago
      "humiliating" folks might not be the proportional response when innocent people are dying
      • biophysboy 57 minutes ago
        How else are we supposed to deter tech people from working for Palantir? What is a good polite method?
        • cies 49 minutes ago
          The govt contract with them should be voided. That's the way.

          But in the US no one believes they can meaningfully influence govt for real issues. And they are right.

          Sure you can get them to paint a rainbow zebra crossing. /s

          But not stop/prevent a (civil) war. Democracy dies and lobbyism (what we call corruption in "modern western democracies" -- because we dont do corruption, that's for poor countries!) takes over when the power is consolidated at a high enough level.

          • biophysboy 46 minutes ago
            In the meantime, between now and the elections, what is a good method for deterring tech people from working for ICE? They are administering an authoritarian state today.
        • my65thaccount 45 minutes ago
          [flagged]
      • Kapura 58 minutes ago
        people cannot yet be held accountable; this is an important first step, however.
        • wutwutwat 26 minutes ago
          Ah ok, we'll hold people accountable. Sweet!

          Hopefully the number of people who die stays low until that happens, which always happens, at least.

    • fourseventy 57 minutes ago
      [flagged]
      • biophysboy 56 minutes ago
        Evil X thing happened; therefore, do evil Y thing - go fuck yourself.
        • tpurves 39 minutes ago
          [this is a reply to fourseventy] Looking up the violent crime rates by migrants in places like MN, it's effectively zero. As a rule, migrants and immigrants don't commit crimes at anything close to the rate of native US citizens.

          Meanwhile in Minneapolis, the overwhelming majority of violent crimes (including aggravated assaults, theft, murders and sexual assaults) are being committed by ICE agents.

          • jalapenoh 11 minutes ago
            they rape at triple the rate of a citizen, any statistic that contradicts globalism will be frauded
        • fourseventy 53 minutes ago
          [flagged]
          • CodeMage 49 minutes ago
            Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? If all ICE did was deport immigrants, following the established laws and procedures, I would agree with you. As it stands, ICE is more evil, because they are abusing power and breaking laws they are supposed to uphold. And they're able to do so because people like you enabled those who are letting ICE get away with it.
  • kevmo 55 minutes ago
    Mods are going to boot this off the front page.
    • pjc50 32 minutes ago
      Mostly flagging from individual pro-ICE HN accounts.
  • poszlem 1 hour ago
    I remember hearing the "imagine if Stasi/Gestapo had the data Facebook and Twitter have on us" argument for years. Turns out they were right to be worried.
    • Kapura 6 minutes ago
      Why would you think they wouldn't be right? Even on paper, doesn't that sound like a bad thing?

      the past 15 years of my life feels like a bus full of people yelling at the driver to not hit the wall he's speeding towards and he's just ignoring them saying "it will be fine." and here we are!

  • ARandumGuy 1 hour ago
    I don't know how much people outside of MN know about what's going on, but it's fucking dire here. However bad you think it is, it's worse.
  • an0malous 42 minutes ago
    I remember in the 2010s when Silicon Valley was full of founders who genuinely wanted to use technology to make the world a better place, and now it's just fascists who want to use technology to kill brown people more efficiently
    • fnimick 31 minutes ago
      > Silicon Valley was full of founders who genuinely wanted to use technology to make the world a better place

      No, it wasn't, it was full of people who said they wanted to use technology to make the world a better place because saying you would use technology to make the world a better place was viewed as the path to investment and success.

      Now, as soon as feigned empathy is no longer required for $$$, the mask comes off. It was never about anything other than profit.

      • goatlover 9 minutes ago
        And yet their base ate up the claim that DOGE was about getting rid of waste, fraud and abuse.
  • Devasta 49 minutes ago
    Is there any reason to work for Palantir if you aren't a fascist?
    • lokar 43 minutes ago
      Most of the people in the Trump administration are not ideological. They are grifters, in it for money and status.

      Palantir is probably similar

      • fnimick 30 minutes ago
        I'm not sure saying "I don't care if we do fascism as long as it makes me money" is any more morally defensible.
        • lokar 12 minutes ago
          But, I hope, it does point to a weakness, for now.
      • evan_ 26 minutes ago
        > Historians have a word for Germans who joined the Nazi party, not because they hated Jews, but out of a hope for restored patriotism, or a sense of economic anxiety, or a hope to preserve their religious values, or dislike of their opponents, or raw political opportunism, or convenience, or ignorance, or greed.

        > That word is "Nazi." Nobody cares about their motives anymore.

  • decremental 16 minutes ago
    [dead]
  • em1sar 46 minutes ago
    [dead]
  • jmyeet 46 minutes ago
    [flagged]
  • heraldgeezer 1 hour ago
    [flagged]
  • misiti3780 37 minutes ago
    [flagged]
    • an0malous 36 minutes ago
      It's about a technology built by a well known technology company, why wouldn't it be on HN?
    • b65e8bee43c2ed0 21 minutes ago
      consent manufacturing.

      to someone who browses with showdead=no, it will appear that everyone here agrees that ICE=bad, because everyone who dissents gets [dead] and/or [flagged] despite being perfectly civil.

  • timeimp 1 hour ago
    [flagged]
  • leftistlozers 17 minutes ago
    [flagged]
  • mreti_par 35 minutes ago
    Frick Trump and frick all the pieces of dump that vote red! I hope you and all your loved ones de a horrible deth. You are ruining the entire world!

    Why am I being downvoted? Has HN been invaded by Trump's scum too?

  • unstyledcontent 1 hour ago
    Make no mistake, the immigration enforcement operations in Minnesota are only a training ground for how to undermine civil rights for us all. Everyone is ok targeting te immigrant populations because they are "illegal" or live in a gray area of legality. But eventually these same tools will be used against us.
    • matthewkayin 1 hour ago
      > Everyone is ok targeting the immigrant populations

      To echo another commentor, we're not. And even if we were, this is not how it should be done. Enforcing the laws is one thing, but we have to have due process. Without due process, we have no rights.

      • jasonjayr 51 minutes ago
        Due process for EVERY person in the legal territory regardless of who or what they are. Otherwise it's way to easy to say, "they're the other, and have no rights", and they are already using this line.
        • daveguy 42 minutes ago
          Which is absolutely unconstitutional. The constitution says the 4th amendment protects all people, not just citizens. It's been upheld many times by the supreme court. This administration is knowingly and willingly trampling the constitution. The midterm elections can't come soon enough. And in the meantime we all need to get in the streets. Anyone can manipulate social media. But you can't manipulate the narrative when there is an overwhelming number of brave people in the streets clearly and peacefully protesting.
      • BuckRogers 45 minutes ago
        [flagged]
        • andruby 36 minutes ago
          And what happens when they deport you, "BuckRogers"?

          Proving whether or not someone is supposed to be here requires due process. If they pick up the wrong person (because people have the same name, or look alike, or any reason) and deport them, then what? Are you going to accept that you or your family or friends get deported?

          We shouldn't accept any false positives. And that's what due process is.

        • mlnj 35 minutes ago
          How would you know if you were supposed to be here or not without due process.

          YOU would not even get a chance to prove your case when they deport you. And I use "you" here deliberately because everyone is at some point at the lowest rung of the ladder in a fascist regime.

    • jawilson2 1 hour ago
      > Everyone is ok targeting te immigrant populations

      No, we're not.

      • hydrogen7800 48 minutes ago
        I think the GP means the collective "we" is OK with it, evidenced simply by the fact that it is happening.
        • drcongo 47 minutes ago
          Yep, and from the outside, the rest of the world is watching you all just let it happen.
          • carefulfungi 40 minutes ago
            How can you watch the protest and organization in MN and conclude people are "just letting it happen". Quite the opposite.
            • drcongo 0 minutes ago
              Sorry, bad wording. I was using the "you all" in the same context as the parent's "collective we". Yes, there's tens of thousands out in the streets protesting, but also yes there's tens of millions who aren't.
          • lmz 15 minutes ago
            A lot of the world would not tolerate the amount of illegals that the US has within its borders.
      • leftistlozers 16 minutes ago
        then vote for open borders

        as long as there are borders, illegals shall be removed

    • mosura 1 hour ago
      Then argue for democratically changing the law to make them unambiguously legal.

      Selectively enforcing only the laws you want to is the key enabler of corruption.

      • ceejayoz 1 hour ago
        > Selectively enforcing only the laws you want to is the key enabler of corruption.

        Like expanding Presidential immunity specifically for a President with 34 existing felony convictions?

        Or the admin refusing to even investigate the agent in the Good shooting (https://www.axios.com/2026/01/14/ice-trump-minneapolis-inves...) while going after her widow (https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/13/us/prosecutors-doj-resign...)?

        • mosura 57 minutes ago
          [flagged]
          • lokar 49 minutes ago
            I accept that US law, and its execution on border crossings and asylum was disastrous. Over many administrations.

            That in no way justifies this move to an unaccountable paramilitary force attacking US citizens who are legally exercising their rights.

          • ceejayoz 54 minutes ago
            > By failing to accept that you are being selective.

            Are you not being selective?

            https://hn.algolia.com/?query=mosura%20Trump&type=comment

            • mosura 51 minutes ago
              That link makes no sense for your comment, but it was an interesting insight into your thinking.
              • ceejayoz 49 minutes ago
                I'll ask more directly, then, I suppose.

                Do you believe Trump should be immune to those felony convictions? Are you… selective in which laws you like?

      • lokar 23 minutes ago
        Current ICE/Homeland Security actions are unambiguously illegal.

        The problem is that without an independent congress the US system is able to descend into authoritarianism. The court has (reasonably) decided that on many broad issues regarding presidential actions and abuse of authority only congress (via impeachment and removal) is able to constrain the president.

        The current congressional majority has, for now, decided to allow the president to do almost anything he wants, regardless of the law and constitution.

      • bonsai_spool 1 hour ago
        > Selectively enforcing only the laws you want to is the key enabler of corruption.

        That's what the OP is saying.

        • mosura 1 hour ago
          [flagged]
          • lokar 1 hour ago
            They are engaged is massive violations of US law
          • biophysboy 1 hour ago
            Detaining citizens is not immigration law.
          • GordonS 45 minutes ago
            Because that's plainly not what they are always doing. And the aggressive, racist unprofessional, downright dangerous way ICE are going about things is simply shocking.
          • fzeroracer 1 hour ago
            You can watch any of these videos I posted a few days ago [1] and tell me why.

            https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46598192

          • mrtesthah 1 hour ago
            ICE is blatantly violating peoples’ rights. Read any comment on this page.
      • pstuart 1 hour ago
        Congress has been neutered and there's been efforts to ensure that it stays that way.
        • jshier 54 minutes ago
          Congress hasn't been neutered, they can reclaim their power at any time. Republicans in power simply refuse to act at all.
          • ceejayoz 18 minutes ago
            That they neutered themselves doesn't make them any less neutered.

            I'm skeptical about their ability to reclaim it, too. Lots of them remember being terrified and running away Jan 6, even if many now pretend not to... and SCOTUS has been on a tear wiping out long-standing legislation Congress was quite clear about like the Voting Rights Act.

        • SlightlyLeftPad 1 hour ago
          It’s the literal plot of Star Wars
        • mosura 1 hour ago
          It isn’t new though. The whole reason it is such a mess now is it was equally deliberately ignored for decades.
    • the__alchemist 1 hour ago
      I have a hunch most people recognize this, but many are ok with it. I have hope (But not confidence) people will see this in the upcoming US elections and more broadly. This is transparent authoritarian behavior.

      Edit: Challenge: If you downvoted the parent post here (It's currently grey), I would love to hear why you think this doesn't match the pattern. Are you living in the US? I in general am struggling to understand my fellow US citizens, given the history of our nation.

      • RHSeeger 1 hour ago
        I would start with this, because it's a flat out lie

        > Everyone is ok targeting te immigrant populations because they are "illegal" or live in a gray area of legality.

        People have been complaining about the attack on immigrants for a good, long while. And the complaining has been getting louder, more frequent, and from more people with every day. When they kidnapped workers and suddenly the price of everything went up, there was a lot of "see?!? this is what we're talking about"

        So no, "everyone" isn't ok with the targeting of immigrants.

        • sjsdaiuasgdia 51 minutes ago
          They should have said "enough are ok" instead of "everyone is ok".

          Unfortunately, there are still enough people who are fine with the Trump / Miller / Noem / Bovino approach to immigration enforcement, or they're not impacted personally enough to make them speak or act.

          I hope the cartoon villain responses coming from the administration when they're challenged on any of this will get more people to stand up against it all.

      • smt88 1 hour ago
        I expect masked ICE agents to be deployed to polls in purple and blue states to "prevent non-citizens from voting" (i.e. to scare minorities away from polls)
        • ecshafer 1 hour ago
          Bet. Lets see if we can get this up on polymarket, bet on it.
          • staplers 27 minutes ago
            You already lost your own bet.

            "A pair of armed and masked men in tactical gear stood guard at ballot drop boxes in Mesa, Ariz., on Oct. 21 as people began early voting for the 2022 midterm elections."

            They might be "off-duty" but this is during Biden's admin. They're immensely more emboldened now and local LE will absolutely not enforce any laws restricting this.

            Source: https://www.cnbc.com/2022/11/06/election-officials-facing-ar...

            • ecshafer 6 minutes ago
              So the goal post moved from ICE or Federal agents being stationed at polling stations to any individual at all?
        • andsoitis 1 hour ago
          > deployed to polls in purple and blue states to "prevent non-citizens from voting" (i.e. to scare minorities away from polls)

          MOST states (purple, blue, red) have mail-in voting. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postal_voting_in_the_United_St...

          • ceejayoz 56 minutes ago
            They're working on that.

            Challenging the rules: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/supreme-court-revives-...

            Changing the rules at USPS: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/how-this-new-mail-rule-c...

            And I'd fully expect some fuckery via executive orders closer to the election, and SCOTUS to use the emergency docket to let them "temporarily" be enforced.

          • JayNitram 54 minutes ago
            Correct, which the administration is also trying to remove.
          • lokar 56 minutes ago
            For now. The tyrant controls the post office.
          • kgwxd 55 minutes ago
            They're targeting that too. e.g. recent change to postmark dates.
          • buellerbueller 56 minutes ago
            It is being restricted. My red state has gone from allowing mail-in ballots that were allowed if they were postmarked by election day, to requiring them to be in by election day. When the postmaster general is a Trump appointee, and the mail has slowed down over the last few years, it makes me wonder if this is deliberate.
      • fourseventy 1 hour ago
        [flagged]
        • the__alchemist 59 minutes ago
          Do you truly believe that is the intent behind the use of ICE in MN and beyond, and that is where it will stop?
          • fourseventy 55 minutes ago
            Yes. ICE has existed long before Trump and will exist after. Deportation of illegal immigrants is not a new thing.
            • footy 21 minutes ago
              ICE has only existed since 2003 which I'd argue is not "before Trump" and regardless is not a long time.
    • ks2048 50 minutes ago
      Musk tweeted yesterday that speaking hate against the country should be considered treason and lead to being locked-up.

      It's not hard to shift "anti-American" speech to mean "anti-ICE", anti-current-administration, etc.

      • cies 46 minutes ago
        He should be allowed to say that.

        But it should not be enforced, or the constitution became toilet paper. I think we are arriving at the latter.

      • andruby 16 minutes ago
        Mr "free speech" Musk (/s)

        If it is this tweet you are referring to, it's about _teaching_ hate, which is only a slight nuance and still a terrible point to make for a self-labeled "free speech absolutist"

        > Teaching people to hate America fundamentally destroys patriotism and the desire to defend our country.

        > Such teachings should be viewed as treason and those who do it imprisoned.

        https://xcancel.com/elonmusk/status/2011519593492402617#m

        • ceejayoz 12 minutes ago
          > it's about _teaching_ hate

          Which is free speech, unfortunately.

          And a very difficult thing to define, and very clearly not the sort of thing that'd be enforced against, say, the current President no matter how clear the violation.

    • jordanpg 1 hour ago
      Along the same lines, anyone who thinks this is just about immigration should ask themselves what all these tens of thousands of ICE agents are going to do when all the immigrants are finally deported.

      Are they just going to go home and go back to their old jobs? Or do you think the Administration is going to find something else for them to do.

      • Aurornis 1 hour ago
        Deportations aren’t all that high. The raids are theater.

        Thinking that they’re going to deport all the immigrants isn’t realistic or supported by the numbers. Immigration control is a constant ongoing operation in every country. This administration is just making a big show out of it for political points.

        • jordanpg 47 minutes ago
          My point still stands. The country will obviously not be permanently swarming with ICE agents violently grabbing immigrants off the street. There is going to be mission creep. If this isn't obvious then I don't know what to else I can say to convince you. Immigration is clearly just a pretext to establishing a national police force.

          Remember this thread when you hear for the first time that ICE agents are tasked with doing something that has nothing to do with immigration enforcement. Coming soon.

          • sgc 32 minutes ago
            It looked like your jeans might be knock-offs. Customs violation. Time to flashbang your kids.
          • drstewart 14 minutes ago
            >Remember this thread when you hear for the first time that ICE agents are tasked with doing something that has nothing to do with immigration enforcement. Coming soon.

            And when it doesn't, will you remember the wild accusations you made or off making others with no accountability?

        • sjsdaiuasgdia 22 minutes ago
          Hitler's regime didn't start out making death camps for Jews. The initial plan was to deport them, with camps for holding and processing. That was unrealistic given the volume of people to process, which led to the detention and work camps converting to death camps.

          This is relevant to mention because the number of people in ICE detention right now is spiking: https://tracreports.org/immigration/quickfacts/detention.htm...

          Just saying, similar outcomes could occur here. It's happened before. Their goals being unrealistic doesn't mean they'll stop, and may be part of their justification for doing even worse things than they're already doing.

        • IncreasePosts 1 hour ago
          I don't think it is just political points. Illegal Mexican border crossings crashed on the run up to Trump taking presidency. Signaling you'll get captured and deported wherever you are, I'm sure if keeping a lot of people who would be illegal immigrants away.
        • zxcvasd 1 hour ago
          [dead]
      • actionfromafar 1 hour ago
        They might "look for immigrants" near polling stations in November?

        Would be very bad if "immigrants" (i.e. not wearing a fair face with a matching MAGA hat) could vote, amirite?

        • jalapenoh 58 minutes ago
          [flagged]
          • convolvatron 46 minutes ago
            47 million voters have been run through the citizenship database, and 10,000 were flagged for investigation. which is 0.02% even if all those turn out to be noncitizens. you're just repeating empty assertions without evidence
            • jalapenoh 31 minutes ago
              [flagged]
              • sjsdaiuasgdia 19 minutes ago
                You know this already and my comment will be killed, but I must say this to you:

                You are human garbage.

      • FartinMowler 42 minutes ago
        They could monitor the midterm elections /s
    • jalapenoh 1 hour ago
      [flagged]
    • gadders 1 hour ago
      Citation needed.
    • 10xDev 1 hour ago
      Palestine was the training ground, now it is being deployed back at home. Turns out it is a small world and you shouldn't have selective empathy.

      "First they came for the Communists And I did not speak out Because I was not a Communist Then they came for the Socialists And I did not speak out Because I was not a Socialist Then they came for the trade unionists And I did not speak out Because I was not a trade unionist Then they came for the Jews And I did not speak out Because I was not a Jew Then they came for me And there was no one left To speak out for me"

  • creatonez 14 minutes ago
    Every single engineer who works on this should be in prison for life. Nuremberg trials are coming. Be careful associating yourself with techno-fascists, history will not forget what you did.