Court denies motion to dismiss DRAM price fixing case

(litnews.ai)

59 points | by ybathaee 5 hours ago

4 comments

  • SubiculumCode 1 hour ago
    If they are price fixing, eff them.

    Finally secure a research grant and had budgeted money for a new compute workstation and the RAM prices are killing my budget, because I'd love to get at least 256 GB of RAM and that's 4-5 grand now. Ridiculous, especially since I'd like to have a GPU in it with at least 32Gb of VRAM for medical image model training, so that is also like 4-5 grand too.

    Do I wait two years and hope, or pay, isthe question I keep asking myself.

    • mdorazio 38 minutes ago
      Why can't you train with a cloud service?
      • doc_ick 12 minutes ago
        That’s not necessarily private then, and billing changes based on whims.
  • sysguest 35 minutes ago
    idk going with DDR3/4/5 upgrades are really makes me doubt the whole argument...

    those upgrades ARE ACTUAL UPGRADES, and if exiting ddr4 helps on producing more ddr5, why not?

    (and the cheap chinese makers can produce plenty of those ddr4 chips, so it's NOT that "monopoly destroying the market" scenario)

    • cowlevel 5 minutes ago
      It doesn't. They're made in different factories with different processes.
  • mesm7903 36 minutes ago
    [flagged]
  • moribvndvs 1 hour ago
    I swear if they are found guilty of price fixing 13 or 14 more times, I’m outta here.
    • minraws 1 hour ago
      To where exactly?
      • briffle 34 minutes ago
        Intel optane, of course!
    • somenameforme 31 minutes ago
      Don't worry, this time the fine's going to be unprecedented, maybe even a whole week of revenue. That'll show 'em!