4 comments

  • 4ndrewl 4 hours ago
    I thought this was a well known effect - it's certainly filtered down to some paperback popsci archaeology books I've read in the past few years.
    • bcraven 2 hours ago
      This appears to be a comment, highlighting a case study that demonstrates the effect in detail.

      It is not purporting to show it as 'new'.

    • Legend2440 30 minutes ago
      I remember reading about it as a kid, in 1990s creationist books that were attempting to argue that carbon dating couldn't be trusted and the world was actually only 6,000 years old.
  • pvaldes 15 hours ago
    Yep. I suspected that that arctic shark couldn't be so old.
    • gus_massa 8 hours ago
      I think the age is calculated counting the "rings" in ... [looking at google] ... the vertebrae.
  • archimedes237 55 minutes ago
    Defiling the dead bodies of monks...