Quasi-Logarithmic Kitchen Timer

(blog.coredump.cx)

74 points | by surprisetalk 4 days ago

15 comments

  • amelius 9 minutes ago
    I like this, but I want a timer with at least 3 timers in it, memory options. I have a digital one from AliExpress, which is quite OK, except the alarm sound is too faint and the memory button UX is awkward.
  • zokier 5 hours ago
    My microwave timer increases in 5, 10, 30, 60, ... second steps when turning the knob, so basically very similar scheme to this. Works pretty well imho.

    With rotary encoders you can also do velocity sensing which could allow convenient coarse/fine adjustment, but for kitchen timer that probably isn't that useful.

  • shellfishgene 1 hour ago
    I like it, but like the kitchen timer I built a while back with a rotary encoder knob, it doesn't run on batteries forever like most cheap timers. Maybe with AI help I could get that done though. (At least for a digital one, not sure how much power that physical dial uses.)
  • krackers 8 hours ago
    What about removing the "0" label (which is implicit anyways) and having a label at 10sec instead. That would preserve the pattern that the last label is self-documenting as the increment interval.
  • exmadscientist 3 hours ago
    If you're not set on analog and want a countertop timer, just get one of these: https://www.thermoworks.com/products/extra-big-loud-timer (though probably on sale soon given the season). It's one of those products that just does exactly what it says on the tin: it's extra big (very easy to operate!) and extra loud (they do mean that one).

    Though if you prefer a portable one you can stuff in your pocket they have that too, and it also does just what it says on the tin.

  • TomJansen 5 hours ago
    Kinda clever, not sure I understand why you want 25% of the dial dedicated to 0-60 seconds. In cooking nothing is really that precise to justify that
    • schiffern 4 hours ago
      Indeed. For a dial microwave (the pinnacle of UX design IMO) 5-10 seconds is perfect for warming food, but as a kitchen 'egg timer' I unfortunately can't see much utility to small increments.
      • Isamu 1 hour ago
        Hang on, literal egg timing (boiled eggs) requires exact minutes and varies according to how you want your yolk, which in my case also depends on what I am using it for.
  • sinuhe69 1 hour ago
    Add a voice recognition to set the timer would be nice!
  • pseudohadamard 4 hours ago
    This is, on the one hand, a very cool design, but on the other a sad indictment of more-buttons-is-better design in Western appliances. Go to Japan and most microwaves have two dials, one for power, one for time. 99.9% of the time you can get what you want with a twist of the time dial and be halfway through cooking/heating your food while the person with the keypad microwave is still trying to figure out which of the pre-Sumerian glyphs in dark grey on black keys against a black background is the one they need to press.
    • schiffern 4 hours ago
      TIL I'm Japanese apparently
  • lifestyleguru 56 minutes ago
    It's a smart solution from someone who apparently doesn't do much cooking in the kitchen themselves:)
  • mschuster91 1 hour ago
    Microwaves... I personally find something else more annoying, the power output is often regulated by a very crude PWM - so basically if your magnetron is rated for 1 kW, "500W" is effectively 30 seconds on, 30 seconds off, or 15 seconds on, 15 seconds off, 15 seconds on and 15 seconds off. Or whatever ratio the microwave controller uses under the hood.

    That's fine if you need something to be in the microwave for a few minutes, but it absolutely sucks if you need something to be close to (or much less than) the period time... it's completely random and depending where the prior usage started, how much active time your ingredients experience.

    • mhb 43 minutes ago
      Panasonic Inverter microwaves output continuously at the power level you specify.
  • emil-lp 6 hours ago
    Why not the standard 1,2,5,10?
    • myrmidon 3 hours ago
      Probably because he wanted equidistant tick marks, and this way, each label is also the unit for the major ticks in the section that follow it.
  • chadgpt5 8 hours ago
    Why is the wakeup feature needed?
  • globular-toast 3 hours ago
    Like the author, I've also found there are no great kitchen timers. I've had some ovens in the past that do an OK job, but my current one is terrible. I've been using a clockwork one for the past few years, but it does have the noted shortcoming of only ringing once.

    The quasi-logarithmic idea is a good one. I would buy a simple one that just has a dial. No button required. But I agree with the other commenter that the 0-60 part would be quite useless for a kitchen timer. Better to have more resolution in the commonly used 0-30 minute range.

  • nkko 5 hours ago
    love the clicks and sounds in the demo