5 comments

  • simonw 12 minutes ago
    There are a few problems with using OpenRouter's public statistics to make statements about the wider field:

    - It only tracks companies that have decided to use OpenRouter to help them switch models - which biases towards companies that like open weights. Anyone using OpenAI or Anthropic directly is much less likely to be represented.

    - OpenRouter don't share the number of unique users represented in those numbers. I worry a lot about whales - are there a few giant users of OpenRouter who, if they change their preferred model, instantly affect the global leaderboards?

    In this case I suspect the numbers are affected by the release of Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-6 Luna - both excellent inexpensive models, which may well take market share from some of the models that OpenRouter is serving. OpenAI and Anthropic have the most mature client support so I expect it's more likely people will switch away from OpenRouter if those are their daily drivers.

    Happy to be convinced otherwise if anyone has useful data that I've missed.

  • abalashov 7 minutes ago
    While we don't "token-maxx", our usage of Kimi K3, GLM 5.3, MiMo and Qwen goes up, up, up -- with Kimi K3 dominating. Our usage of Claude Code and OpenAI has been nonexistent for a year and a half...
  • jedberg 12 minutes ago
    Or maybe Codex/Claude Code got better and more people are just using those?

    Or more people are using harnesses that do what openrouter does so they don't need it anymore?

    Or they are using other GPU providers directly to run their open source models?

    I don't think this data is conclusive. It's a very unique subset who are using openrouter.

  • jpalawaga 25 minutes ago
    Dead just like it was in June?
  • epsteingpt 19 minutes ago
    Absolutely sure this is bullish.
    • meredithbloom 10 minutes ago
      It is. The graph on their front page shows exponential growth.