5 comments

  • rob74 29 minutes ago
    In the meantime, another city with iconic horse-drawn carriages, Vienna (where the carriages, unlike in New York, actually use city streets), is debating whether the horses should get a day off if temperatures rise above 30° C (currently it's 35°), and only a few officials are meekly suggesting that a complete ban might be considered at some point in the future.

    https://www-ganz--wien-at.translate.goog/wien/news/pro-contr...

    • ErroneousBosh 22 minutes ago
      I was a bit surprised to see quite so many when I was over last August and it was well north of 35°C - you'd think with the water-bottle and sprinkler stations everywhere they'd also throw out a couple of troughs of water for the horses.

      They all seemed to be in good health, from what I saw, but horses are pretty finicky creatures - we humans domesticated the horse about 20,000 years ago, breeding the strongest healthiest creatures we could, and they're still a bit shit - and I wouldn't be surprised if a less attentive driver is going to end up killing one.

  • Ericson2314 57 minutes ago
    This is a bigger deal than it might sound. Despite lots of consensus that the horse carriages are bad, it has taken years to get this done. It infamously stalled during De Blasio's mayoralty too, for example.

    This is also an L for the TWU, and I suspect there will be more of those to come in the following months.

    • dataflow 28 minutes ago
      Why can't they pass legislation to get the horses treated better instead of banning them?
    • jimbob45 49 minutes ago
      Not that I disagree but what has that consensus centered around?
      • sincerely 41 minutes ago
        Egregious & consistent mistreatment of the horses.

        The past four mayors have all tried to end the practice but the jockeys (drivers?) are part of a powerful transportation union.

        • gpt5 15 minutes ago
          If that's the reason, then the solution sounds like a typical bad bureaucratic government - instead of fixing the problem (improved treatment for horses), ban the whole thing.
  • dyauspitr 57 minutes ago
    They for some reason made the area around Central Park more sophisticated
  • gautamcgoel 14 minutes ago
    [dead]
  • jiaosdjf 48 minutes ago
    He's doing this because an Indian tourist was killed by a horse - they are quite notorious for being hit by trains, jagannatha etc.

    Some people say that it's because forcing horses to work in a dense, heavily polluted urban environment is cruel, but I don't see these rules being applied to Sarah Jessica Parker.

    I'll get my coat

    • comrade1234 45 minutes ago
      > He's doing this because an Indian tourist was killed by a horse - they are quite notorious for being hit by trains, jagannatha etc.

      Is that real or just a meme? I mean the part about Indians being notorious for being hit by trains.

      • disillusioned 28 minutes ago
        India averages 20,000 deaths by train every year. About 16 deaths per 100,000 people.

        Compare to 40,000 vehicle deaths in the US (and 960 train deaths, 2.8 deaths per 100,000 people), and 177,000 vehicle deaths in India.

        But India only has 1 death per _4.1 billion passenger-miles_. The US is 1 death per 2.33 billion passenger-miles.

        Anecdotally, there's a _lot_ of Indians-walking-near-trains-and-getting-hit-posting-them-doing-it videos on reddit.

        In any event, the OP is way off target anyway. The poor kid was in a carriage with his mom, the horse got spooked, she fell out and he leapt out to try to save her but hit his head and died.

        • rob74 3 minutes ago
          I guess the "deaths per billion passenger-miles" is not a good metric, because travelling by rail is simply not that popular in the US (I assume the statistic does not include metro systems?). But if you get run over by a train, it doesn't really matter if it was a freight train or a passenger train (<5% of train casualties are actual train passengers).
      • ErroneousBosh 12 minutes ago
        > I mean the part about Indians being notorious for being hit by trains.

        I'm genuinely surprised we don't see more Indian tourists getting hit by cars, at least here in Scotland. There's a bit of a trend on social media over there, where you'll get an Indian couple on holiday in Scotland taking photos of themselves sitting in the middle of a road.

        Roads here are often narrow, twisty, fast, uneven, and extremely busy, so it's quite possible if you do this that the last photo ever taken of you will be the frame juuuust before the dashcam triggers.

        If you look at the bush on the right of the road here just as the road curves (we drive on the left; this is looking from the back of the Streetview car heading south), when I was up a few weeks ago there was an Indian couple in wedding clothing sitting cross-legged in the middle of the road right at that bend taking a photo. I should actually pull the dashcam footage of that!

        Anyway, that's a 60mph road. Do not sit in the middle of busy 60mph roads, no matter how cool the photo is. That was nearly a very short marriage, "until death do us part out into a thin smear with small chunks in for several hundred metres"...