9 comments

  • swiftcoder 20 minutes ago
    > Then, suddenly, the nausea hit... The problem was not the flavor, not the texture, but the knowing. The Knowing. Knowing about the fat tank, about the sticky white substance...

    I feel like squeamish people are probably not the best ones to write about novel meat products...

    • FranzFerdiNaN 9 minutes ago
      So a tank is problematic, but a slaughter house is fine?
      • boxed 5 minutes ago
        Yea.. like.. look into the sheeps eyes as you cut it's throat and then tell me again how a lab is "icky".
    • ForHackernews 11 minutes ago
      Need to make these people visit a slaughterhouse.
    • thrance 6 minutes ago
      And it's so stupid honestly. Why is this making them queasy, but not the slaughterhouses, the industrial farms, the cattle pumped with antibiotics to prevent infections from the open wounds inflicted by their terrible environment, etc. I'd take cells grown in a vat over dead animals everyday.

      This is such a stupid line, it makes me wonder if this article just wasn't paid for by a meat industry lobby. Meat industry who we know for a fact is already putting a lot of energy into fighting alternatives, like impossible meat.

  • dr_dshiv 10 minutes ago
    Would it make the meat industry more ethical if happy drugs were made available to animals? If I had to choose between a meaningful (even if I didn’t know it when living), blissful unnatural life and none at all, I’d choose the former.

    It’s the negative affect and suffering (stress, pain, boredom etc) that is the bad part of eating animals.

    (I think— I know others have thought more than I on this topic)

    It just seems like an easier tech solution might be promising

    • pitchlatte 3 minutes ago
      solve the land use problem for growing cattle feed if you want it to be maximally ethical.
  • lordnacho 15 minutes ago
    I'm a bit surprised that we got disembodied intelligence before we got deathless meat. If you'd told me in the year 2000 that one of these would happen, I'd have put my money on the meat.
    • stephbook 9 minutes ago
      Hardware is harder than software.
  • dinkblam 32 minutes ago
    it is sad how the lobbying of old evil industries like tobacco and animal-killing can convince the politicians and the public to outlaw and demonize their less-evil competition like vaping and lab-grown meat to make sure to hold on to the status quo.

    but why write more than 7000 words to communicate a simple point (lab-grown meat was promised 1-2 decades ago but failed to arrive and won't arrive in the foreseeable future)?

    • Brendinooo 7 minutes ago
      It doesn't seem like there's this finished product ready to go that's just cost-prohibitive because of malicious regulation.

      So at this point it's not even clear that anyone is actually losing their grip on the status quo...

    • cpursley 18 minutes ago
      Is it just pure lobbying or perhaps also consumer preference? Because there’s plenty of money to be made across the entire agriculture and food and production spectrum in the processing of the goop that goes into these types of products. I think a lot of people honestly would rather eat a real vegetarian diet (Indian, etc) than the ultra processed soy beans and various chemical binders wearing a meat Halloween costume.
      • sevenzero 9 minutes ago
        I dont think people who would consider a full vegetarian/vegan diet without supplementary products that look like "meat" are the target consumer base for these products. The money is in a consumer base that does not want to fully commit to a certain diet, know that the meat industry is bad for the planet and is unsure on how to go about it.

        Personally I'd rather eat highly processed soy beans over parts of a dead animal.

        • anthonj 3 minutes ago
          Not that simple, about 5% of the world population has G6PD deficiency and can get sick or die from a diet based on many kind of beans.

          I would consider a vegetarian diet, but I can't eat lentils, hummus and beans every day without getting sick (ant my case is quite mild)

          • sevenzero 0 minutes ago
            So they could just buy supplements and other vegetables?
  • Semaphor 13 minutes ago
    I had long given up on lab-grown meat. It started feeling like fusion, always around the corner, but never there (or at least not in an affordable way).

    What replaced almost all ground beef (except in burgers) for me, was Jackfruit. More specifically, the combination 90% pea protein, 10% jackfruit. Granules that can be rehydrated with boiling water in 2 minutes, price competitive with discounter mince, no extra ingredients, no high carb count. It has a good texture and tastes mostly like whatever you season it with.

    • plazma 8 minutes ago
      For me I eat similar thing from eatplanted.com, when they have discounts, otherwise it's still too expensive, but if price was lower I'd eat it all the time, it's that delicious.
      • Semaphor 1 minute ago
        Planted has the issues most meat replacements have, a lot of ingredients, and a higher carb count. Not an issue for everyone, but it is for me.

        Planted: 10 ingredients, 5.6g/100g carbs in the finished product

        Pea/Jackfruit granules: 2 ingredients, 1.9g/100g carbs in the dry product (so roughly 0.8g/100g in the finished product)

  • shrubble 9 minutes ago
    Turns out that nature is a lot more efficient at producing meat; I don’t think this will change for a while, if ever.

    Bugs for chickens, grasses/grains for cattle and omnivorous pigs are there own kind of bio-reactor…

  • truekonrads 14 minutes ago
    Why eat meat at all is the big question? Impossible and Beyond satisfy the taste and craving without the nastiness.
    • Emma_Goldman 3 minutes ago
      Interesting, the question for me is why eat highly-processed meat simulacra, that don't taste particularly nice, like impossible and beyond burgers? I don't really understand the point when it is possible to home cook far healthier and more delicious veggie burgers with seitan, mushrooms, lentils, etcetera. Ultimately, this whole meat substitute market is targeting a niche that doesn't exist at the scale envisioned, because it competes with low cost meat on the one hand and low cost vegetable burgers in the other, and is worse than both on all relevant metrics.
    • torben-friis 11 minutes ago
      They really don't.

      Like, they're close enough for a vegetarian/vegan to get something that reminds them of the taste, but for a frequent meat eater it's not even close sadly. I keep trying from time to time.

      As for why, it's much easier to replace the product than it is to replace the need.

    • stephbook 8 minutes ago
      Costs more, tastes worse and is ultra-processed.
    • nkrisc 10 minutes ago
      Those are pretty good in their own right, but they really aren’t much like meat in my opinion. They’re similar, but they are quite obviously not meat within the first few bites.
    • cpursley 11 minutes ago
      What about the health nastiness that comes along with ultra processed food? Why not just go full blown veggie or vegan? Theres some amazing recipients out there that are healthy as well.
  • TabTwo 28 minutes ago
    I was hoping for Deathless Meat [1] Looks like this does not happen anytime soon.

    [1] see https://www.daniel-suarez.com/changeagentsynopsis.html

  • gadders 16 minutes ago
    I eat meat and like it, but I also feel kind of sorry for cows, sheep, pigs, chickens etc.

    I was initially positive about lab grown meat, but then you realise that Kraft Foods or someone will get hold of it and turn it into the most unhealthy slop you could imagine.