8 comments

  • margalabargala 39 minutes ago
    Could this be considered a good thing?

    The energy being released in these many tiny earthquakes was always going to exist in this location. Much better to release it slowly via thousands of tiny earthquakes than all at once. Better to have 10k magnitude 3 quakes than one magnitude 7.

    • sbuttgereit 2 minutes ago
      Geologic systems are more complex than this. Analyzing something like this as though it were a single system is wrought with the dangers of miscalculation.

      You could locally release stresses on an incremental, short term basis this way in a local system, while at the same time increasing stresses on nearby systems which could fail even more spectacularly, especially if the increasing stresses are being moved from a less dangerous system to a more dangerous system.

      I'm not suggesting the above is true in this case, but that you need to cast a pretty wide net with increasingly unknown (and perhaps unknowable) variables as you start to inject real changes into a local system.

    • booi 27 minutes ago
      It's logarithmic so you'd need more like 30,000 magnitude 3 earthquakes to equal the energy of a magnitude 7. I don't think it's clear this is better. You can also make the argument that this may trigger the large earthquake that might not have happened for a long time.
    • andy_ppp 36 minutes ago
      It can go either way, you might get a relief of pressure or you might get an increased destabilisation in the region.
      • skeptic_ai 31 minutes ago
        There isA study about fire fighting. If you shit down every fire quickly then eventually you’ll have a major black swan. If you let fires burn a bit more then you’ll avoid black swan effect that burns down everything
        • ImJamal 16 minutes ago
          Are fires and earthquakes the same?
        • dataflow 22 minutes ago
          Have you considered logarithms?
    • micromacrofoot 2 minutes ago
      We are not even remotely close to being able to predict this in a way to apply it reliably.
    • johnsmith1840 32 minutes ago
      [flagged]
      • genxy 14 minutes ago
        Good opportunity to make a killing as all that new beachfront property opens up.
        • tacomagick 5 minutes ago
          Before Blackrock buys and sells them at 50000% markup
  • ggg011012 2 minutes ago
    The long delay is the interesting part to me. How do they distinguish earthquakes triggered by the test from normal background seismicity?
    • Waterluvian 1 minute ago
      Sounds like climate change induced disasters, and why it’s so easy to not take responsibility.
  • ortusdux 57 minutes ago
    How long until someone attempts to diffuse a pent up fault line via nuclear geoengineering?
    • rtkwe 31 minutes ago
      The issue on real faults is they span massive areas. The San Andreas fault system spans basically the entire coast of California.

      Even if we could identify the right points there's a big liability shift both legal and political between doing nothing and intentionally setting off an earthquake that would be hard to predict the size of. It's part of why proscribed burns fell out of favor, it's way easier to do nothing and blame nature than defending damage caused by intentional acts. It gets into messy areas where it's hard to convince people that the damage was lesser than it otherwise would have been in the future.

      • gmac 1 minute ago
        Typo: prescribed burns.

        One of the most ridiculous pairs of homophones in the English language.

        Proscribed = forbidden Prescribed = recommended/required

      • WarmWash 20 minutes ago
        >It gets into messy areas where it's hard to convince people that the damage was lesser than it otherwise would have been in the future.

        Morbidly adjacent, the US is still getting dragged over the coals for using nukes on Japan rather than a ground invasion.

      • christina97 19 minutes ago
        If they can’t build high speed rail along the corridor then surely they cannot geo engineer it either!
    • onion2k 35 minutes ago
      It's been theorized and allegedly attempted - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tectonic_weapon
    • metalman 34 minutes ago
      Never, fer get it, in a word, insurance.
    • slater 36 minutes ago
    • make3 10 minutes ago
      Imagine if they trigger the California Big One and all of LA, San Diego and the SF Bay (and innumerable towns) are swallowed "because of man-made actions", I wouldn't want to be the Governor or President to approve that one lol
    • mc32 40 minutes ago
      Sounds like a plot for a Superhero movie ;)
  • SoftTalker 8 minutes ago
    It isn't geological destabilization. They've awakened Godzilla.
  • elictronic 31 minutes ago
    This article does a very poor job of differentiating earthquakes people feel and care about versus magnitude 2 quakes that are like your neighbor dropping a book upstairs.
    • RobotToaster 20 minutes ago
      Makes me think of the fact that the UK officially has over 300 earthquakes per year, but any you would actually feel are unheard of.
  • trumbitta2 20 minutes ago
    Basically, they gave their land Atrial Fibrillation through strong extrasystoles.
  • jdw64 24 minutes ago
    So does that mean the Korean Peninsula is no longer a geologically safe region from earthquakes going forward? That's scary.
    • eu-tech-tak 11 minutes ago
      There have always been earthquakes in Korea. They are just typically quite weak. Though the south region that is closer to Japan has experienced some intense ones, but nothing like the massive ones they have in Japan.
  • ranger_danger 59 minutes ago
    Endless captcha loop for me, is there an archive? (archive.ph etc. has the same issue for me)
    • ENOMEM 56 minutes ago
      • ranger_danger 14 minutes ago
        That is the same site as archive.ph with the same issue :/

        Also they are known for abusing javascript on client browsers to DDoS someone they didn't like.