Apple Watch Series 12

(apple.com)

74 points | by Lealen 41 minutes ago

16 comments

  • ProfessorLayton 8 minutes ago
    The audio note taking feature is extremely off-putting to me and can't believe it was so prominently showcased.

    It's made even worse by the fact that only the newest watches support this, but their external designs are unchanged from past ones, so there's no way to tell who's always listening to everything (I have an Ultra 2, likely my last one).

    Is this something most people want?? At the very least I'd appreciate a notification like the unknown airtag thing to tell me I'm being eavesdropped.

    • jjcob 2 minutes ago
      I wonder if this feature will make people wary of Apple watch wearers.
  • minimaxir 29 minutes ago
    Apple Watch is hitting diminishing returns feature-wise. I'm happy with my Series 11 but "it has more accurate heart sensors" isn't really revolutionary, and I believe some of the Apple Intelligence features will be backported anyways.

    With fast charging, battery life hasn't been an issue; I just put it on the charger while in the shower and that does the trick.

    • Brendinooo 0 minutes ago
      I dunno. Maybe there's a sense in which there's some untapped use cases out there that Apple needs to go figure out. But in a different sense, the idea that I buy a watch that lasts for years and I don't feel like I'm missing out in the meantime...sounds fine?

      I got my first Apple Watch a year and a half ago. After coming to terms with the fact that the form factor has fundamental limitations, it's faded into the background and has been an excellent watch, fitness tracker, and occasional remote control and messaging device. I'm kinda glad that series 11 and 12 haven't given me fomo!

    • jsbisviewtiful 3 minutes ago
      > With fast charging, battery life hasn't been an issue

      I sold my 10 last year and haven’t missed it. You don’t have reasonable access to a charger during a marathon or a long hike, the latter of which needed me to charge my Apple Watch 3 times over the course of 12 hours of hiking.

    • HumblyTossed 7 minutes ago
      > ... and I believe some of the Apple Intelligence features will be backported anyways

      Will it? Because they kind of made it a point, like they typically do, to say features are only possible due to the new chip.

    • CodingJeebus 20 minutes ago
      And the Ultra series have been marginally incremental, emphasis on marginally. They announced that Ultra series 1 software support is ending this year, but I just cannot justify buying another one of these at $800.
  • robviren 26 minutes ago
    On what legal footing does this recap feature stand? In fairly certain there are a non-zero amount of laws prohibiting audio recording without consent. And this wrist mounted always listening thing is likely to end up in a lot of places it should not. Probably burried in the end user agreement that it is 100% the users fault.
    • jdm2212 23 minutes ago
      It produces "high level summaries" so it's perhaps legally akin to note-taking rather than audio recording?
    • corvad 6 minutes ago
      Yes, many states in the U.S. have recording laws that prohibit only one party giving consent to record. Aka: I give consent but the other party may not in which case it could be illegal.
    • doublepg23 21 minutes ago
      I was saying the same to my friend.

      PA has very strict two party consent wiretap laws I'm not sure this feature would clear.

    • owldown 16 minutes ago
      It isn't recording or storing audio, so laws against audio recording don't apply.
    • vulk 20 minutes ago
      I am not sure who and why came up with this looks like a mass surveillance to me.
    • CodingJeebus 23 minutes ago
      IANAL but my guess is that they're leaning heavily into the fact that the feature just generates transcripts and does not persist any audio recordings.
  • adithyassekhar 8 minutes ago
    My left wrist had formed an indent where I wore my se3. It was not worn tight, I tried different straps. In 6 months it looks like the tissue underneath has mostly moved away. I can feel my bone when I touch it. My right arm by contrast looks full like a regular arm.

    Looked up apple watch indent reddit and I saw much more serious cases after years of use.

    I’ve worn a galaxy watch 6 for a year it didn’t leave a mark, casio watches, none. Until apple fixes that weird dome shape never wearing one again. That watch is staying in the box it came in.

    • throaway743838 0 minutes ago
      Did it return to normal after you stopped wearing it? How long did it take?
    • aurareturn 6 minutes ago
      Do you wear it to sleep as well?
      • adithyassekhar 6 minutes ago
        Yes I fell for the collect all data trap. I wore it around 18 hrs at most. Honestly don’t think its worth it. I don’t know what to do with all the data it collects. Doesn’t even have good watch faces to tell the time atleast. Find my phone was useful though.
  • sccxy 33 minutes ago
    Moved to Garmin.

    Maybe less powerful but battery life is the most important feature for me.

    • atomflunder3000 4 minutes ago
      I had one of the first really cheap Xiaomi Smart Watches for 6 years and by the end a single charge lasted 2 weeks. Switched to an Apple Watch and 1 year in it lasts a single day, stopped wearing smart watches a few weeks ago, mainly due to this and just the fact that none of them look good imo.
    • steve_adams_86 27 minutes ago
      I was on the Ultra for 18 months or so and came away from it feeling like a much less powerful and capable Garmin is much nicer as a daily watch. I found myself wanting to find reasons/excuses to justify the Ultra. Ultimately I couldn't, and it wasn't worth its cost, charging schedule, and lack of battery life.

      I can see why others like them (they want WatchOS and Apple-specific capabilities). That stuff is useful, but not often enough for me to care.

      Really, the watch was a regular reminder of how functional life was before the watch existed, if that makes sense. It's a genuine marvel, and yet... I got by (and get by) great without it.

    • rootusrootus 28 minutes ago
      Counterintutively, that didn't work out well for me. When the watch has ample power to make it through one day, but not two, I just put it on my schedule of daily rituals. Usually just throw it on the charger while I take a shower. But when the battery life is measured in weeks, I don't build any sort of habit like that and I end up finding out about it the hard way. My ideal watch never runs out in a single day and charges fast enough that during my shower it will get me through the next day. Based on the stats of the Series 12, it would probably fit the bill.
    • shantara 10 minutes ago
      Moved to Suunto, and I couldn't be happier.

      I had an Apple Watch series 7, which I had to charge twice a day now. I was on a fence between buying a new AW or switching to another brand, but Apple dropping the software support for my model have made the choice for me. I

    • vrosas 16 minutes ago
      I was recently looking for a new running watch but couldn't for the life of me figure out what Garmin's higher end watches do to justify being over $1000. Like, ok, better battery life... but besides that?
    • embedding-shape 28 minutes ago
      > Maybe less powerful but battery life is the most important feature for me.

      I've been using Garmin watches for years, wife always had Apple Watches. This year she got envious enough of the battery life that she also switched to Garmin now. Her watches sometimes barely lasted a day, requiring daily charges. Meanwhile, you get a week of battery easily with most Garmins.

      • iambenm 3 minutes ago
        I went on a multi-week hiking trip this year; Garmin people were charging weekly-ish, I was charging my less than a year old apple watch sometimes twice per day.
  • bstsb 2 minutes ago
    oh come on, i bought my series 11 last week!

    i'm going to miss out on all those amazing new features, like... an improved heart rate variability measurement

  • hakunin 13 minutes ago
    I think Apple Watch is a great device for wearing to gym, to sleep, and somewhat during the day + occasional quick text reply maybe, and otherwise forgetting all about it, because the true value lies in what's being collected in the Health app. Stop trying to do things on it imo. Maybe there are a couple of useful things you can do, or if you're a runner, maybe you can leave your phone at home. I don't have these use cases, but it's valuable to me even without them.

    My recommendation is: buy the cheapest material one every few years. I only ever had 2 and 5 (upgraded due to always on screen), and am considering to finally upgrade to 12.

    • the_sleaze_ 9 minutes ago
      I ditched the screen and got a band with health metrics on it. Its tiny and comfy, no screens, only a wakeup buzz in the morning when I'm most able to wake apparently. Battery lasts maybe a week? Been great. Best of all no advertisements pinging me every few hours.
      • hakunin 7 minutes ago
        I wouldn't mind this (a ring is another option), but 1) you can disable notifications, which I tend to do and 2) the problem is that all independent experiments keep claiming that almost everything is inaccurate out there, and Apple Watch is one of the few surprisingly accurate ones, as compared to real medical equipment.
  • jjcob 5 minutes ago
    Looks like Apple Watch Series 12 still doesn't have dual frequency GPS. Makes it a hard sell for someone who wants to use it as a running watch.
  • vrosas 20 minutes ago
    This thread is just PR people from other watch brands astroturfing.
    • r0fl 5 minutes ago
      That was my same thought! Brands I have never heard of that can't make a call, send messages or add a reminder popping up like they invented sliced bread.

      We get it, some people don't want to charge a watch even though they have to regularly charge their phone, headphones, laptop and maybe car. Such a weird flex that a watch lasts an extra few days, who cares?! Charge it while you shower and you're good to go

    • jotux 16 minutes ago
      Funny, because literally every single apple product page gets posted as "news" to HN and every time I see one I think it's just apple marketing astroturfing. Especially since most of the product updates the last few years seem to fall into the, "BUT SHE'S GOT A NEW HAT" territory.
    • microsoftedging 10 minutes ago
      [dead]
  • kccqzy 24 minutes ago
    Things like the readiness score are long available on competitor smartwatches as well as third-party apps on the App Store.

    The main reason I stopped using an Apple Watch is the lackluster battery life; in this series Apple claims 10 hours of battery life for outdoor workouts but without an iPhone. How is that realistic? If I’m going out for a hourlong run perhaps I don’t bring my iPhone, but I’m doing a multihour outdoor workout I would surely bring my phone, and certainly the extra Bluetooth communication would decrease battery life. It’s a silly metric.

  • vavooom 22 minutes ago
    I can't imagine not having a Garmin watch! Battery life and ability to forget I have it on constantly is a main feature for me
  • tills13 5 minutes ago
    The best thing I ever did was buy an e-paper display watch (pebble) which lasts weeks not hours.
  • Gshaheen 29 minutes ago
    Switched from apple to garmin to coros, not looking back. Coros blows everyone out of the water from a user experience standpoint, and they offer excellent value.
    • runjake 27 minutes ago
      > Coros blows everyone out of the water from a user experience standpoint, and they offer excellent value.

      Why? How?

      • vulk 3 minutes ago
        Value for money, simple software not bloated compared to garmin, heart rate is on par with apple watch. They update their old devices with new features I think one of their models just got a software update for global mapping where you would need to pay extra to get a model with that feature from the competition. Devices could be better in terms of design and fit and finish in time they will get there I hope but overall they are doing pretty good stuff.
    • r0fl 6 minutes ago
      Coros cannot reply to imessages, cannot add to reminders, cannot add to calendar, cannot place a call from the watch

      Yeah, sounds amazing /s

      This thread is becoming low level ragebait

  • corvad 11 minutes ago
    Wanted to look at the study's data, but the link seems to be broken. https://www.apple.com/HRAccuracy/
  • constantinum 30 minutes ago
    Staying with Garmin just for amazingly long battery life… and instinct series has solar too
    • m3kw9 21 minutes ago
      lots of Garmin paid marketing shills popping up, 80% of the posts are so far "Keeping my Garmin because of battery". Ok i'm keeping my casio and is even longer battery life and it tells the time.
      • qwytw 6 minutes ago
        What features is Garmin missing, though? It seems to have most of the stuff you get with an Apple watch and IMHO the Apple watch is objectively exceptionally ugly compared to almost all smartwatches except the more garish "sports" themed ones.
      • xur17 11 minutes ago
        Idk, if you check the profiles of the people posting, these would be pretty expensive shills. I genuinely think it's just happy customers.

        And to pile on, I switched to Garmin a few years ago after a pixel watch and a galaxy watch, and it's night and day. Battery life, and it's built to actually work offline well (global maps, and all of the tracking).

      • 0cf8612b2e1e 18 minutes ago
        No chance those are organic?

        If you are in the market for a multi hundred dollar watch, you must have considered the Garmin and Apple offering for non-time features. Surely some of those people are happy to share their decision.

  • zsoltkacsandi 34 minutes ago
    Disappointing. Instead of making battery life better that would benefit all of the Apple Watch users, here are some random AI features that most of you never gonna usa, and some new colors.
    • nxc18 29 minutes ago
      Even if they’re just matching battery life while adding frequent HRV readings, they’ve made a big advancement. Frequent HRV is a requirement to be a WHOOP/Garmin competitor.

      Previous Apple Watch can do it if you tell it you have afib, but that hurts battery life.

      FWIW I have told it I have afib. I used to have problems with battery life, but I find the Series 11 can finally last all day and overnight with always on display+afib/HRV monitoring; and it charges fast enough I can get close to 100% in the shower, meaning it effectively does not have battery issues.

    • afavour 31 minutes ago
      As someone that has had heart issues, their continued improvements there will keep me a loyal customer for a very long time to come.

      Its position as a health device is underrated in tech circles. As we tech savvy generations age there’s a big market there.

      • zsoltkacsandi 27 minutes ago
        I have hearth issues too, and the metrics Apple provides still do not help detecting them. Not to mention that there is no improvement of their high blood pressure detection. So despite the marketing that they have the most accurate sensor, there is no real advancement here.
      • well_ackshually 27 minutes ago
        Relying on an Apple Watch instead of a proper medical device if you're having heart issues is, well, uh... There's a reason an Apple Watch isn't a medical device.
        • afavour 19 minutes ago
          Consider for a moment that I and my doctor know my medical situation better than you do.

          (it is, by the way, an FDA approved class 2 medical device…)

    • recursive 32 minutes ago
      It puts the AI on its wrist or it gets the hose again.
    • t-writescode 27 minutes ago
      Battery life is better.

      > Longer Workout Battery Life and Faster Charging

      Apple Watch Series 12 continues to offer up to 24 hours of everyday battery life9 and now offers up to 10 hours of battery life during an outdoor workout — 25 percent more than the previous model.10

      An increase to 10 hours of workout tells me battery life is better, but maybe not “better enough” to give the 24 hour number an increase (or the higher HRV checking frequency is eating the rest of the gains)

      • zsoltkacsandi 24 minutes ago
        No, it’s not. 24 hours is the same as series 11. And you are comparing to series 10, not 11, that already had this improvement. I do not work out 10 hours a day, so that number is literally meaningless/pointless.