A Note from LWN

(lwn.net)

120 points | by rwky 37 minutes ago

7 comments

  • AlexB138 27 minutes ago
    LWN is one of the, if not the single, highest signal tech publications around. I hope they're able to maintain a stable subscription service. Being user funded, and avoiding having to maintain allegiance to advertisers, is likely part of why their quality is so high.
    • giancarlostoro 18 minutes ago
      Not only that but lwn is one of the main sites that gets submitted to HN all year round (not daily, but maybe nearish to daily). So the audience here on HN has been exposed to it over the years. I'm not sure what more they could do to get new subscribers, I certainly hope they figure that out or how to get new ways to earn revenue without having to go the ad route.

      https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=lwn.net

      • rdpintqogeogsaa 15 minutes ago
        That's the thing though. You can get all the value from LWN through here. Even if it wasn't for them tolerating subscriber links being posted on HN, the week-long delay isn't nearly enough an incentive to actually subscribe, rationally speaking.
        • tonyarkles 2 minutes ago
          Rationally-speaking, maybe not. I’ve been a long-time subscriber. When I first subscribed, my day-to-day involved embedded Linux and getting the “breaking news” was pretty valuable. These days I still do that somewhat but I’m stuck on a crusty vendor kernel and anything I read about a kernel newer than 5.15 is going to land on my desk in approximately 2028… but I still subscribe, mostly with a patronage mindset: I don’t acutely get value from the subscription every week, but I think it’s a community service and I’m happy to pitch in a few bucks to keep it alive.
        • giancarlostoro 9 minutes ago
          Easy to say until they have to eventually make the hard decision to shut down.
        • roryirvine 12 minutes ago
          I think the generosity and straightforwardness are a big part of the attraction for many subscribers.

          They've always respected their readers and I hope that continues to pay off.

    • upslefts 6 minutes ago
      Except lwn.net use their position for political purposes, and assist social media brigading. They are in no way, shape or form neutral. Not nearly as bad as fraudulent Ycombinator, which is basically a way for pedophiles and crooks to manipulate developers and pass on ownership of startups.
  • Diederich 13 minutes ago
    LWN is one of the cornerstones of my very successful career.

    Starting from the beginning, I have (at least) read through every story and every article, every week, since 1998. Especially in the beginning, there was a lot in each article I didn't understand. I would try to do some digging into those topics.

    One way or another, just the weekly exposure to absolutely top notch technical writing was foundational to me.

    When newer folk would ask me how to really get good with Linux, I would always point them to LWN.net.

    I've been a subscriber since the beginning. That small investment is the least I can do given the incalculable value LWN has brought to me.

  • farlight 8 minutes ago
    I know the editors visit these discussions: please, next time use a more descriptive title! I nearly had a fit when I saw that, really thought LWN is going down like it almost did 20 years ago.

    Happy to pay the new price, even though I can only afford the cheapest tier.

  • roryirvine 22 minutes ago
    Seems like only yesterday when they last increased their prices but it was, in fact, back in January 2022 - time flies!

    I'll have been an LWN subscriber for 22 years as of next week, and am very happy to continue to be one. It's easily the most worthwhile subscription I currently have.

  • microtonal 26 minutes ago
    Thanks LWN team for the honest and straightforward post! The prices you ask are well worth it for the incredible value that LWN provides.

    I forgot to renew my subscription a while back and it has been a bit busy, will renew now.

  • a12ah 15 minutes ago
    I would subscribe if they were more critical of the open source incumbents. Often everything some project bigwig posts on a mailing list is gospel that goes uncontradicted.

    The comments are also getting more and more aligned with industry opinions.

    EDIT: Go and downvote, 80% of comments in the Debian pro-AI resolution (masked as neutral!) were positive and partly from has-beens who no longer want to code but make a bureaucrat career at FAANG or Canonical.

    • noir_lord 5 minutes ago
      You actually created an account to post this rubbish, I'm almost impressed.
  • thataccount 22 minutes ago
    LWN, probably about to discover people are paying high prices for all manner of things and will find that LWN is, sadly, a disposable entity to pay for.
    • mrweasel 13 minutes ago
      You could also see if it's something your employer allows to to expense. It's still cheap enough that it's something most managers can just approve directly, depending on organizational structures.
    • dcow 20 minutes ago
      Based on the initial response, it does not, in fact, seem like this is the conclusion.
    • bryanlarsen 11 minutes ago
      I suspect everybody likely to do so has already done so. Anybody who thinks $6 a month is a lot of money will also think $5 a month is a lot of money for something that they can get for free by waiting a week.
      • thataccount 3 minutes ago
        5 to 6 dollars is not much in terms of a donation. In terms of a subscription, though...One thing is voluntary if you find value, the other is mandatory to get to the value unless you are willing to wait.
    • giancarlostoro 16 minutes ago
      They could always bump down a tier if needed, they have 6 months to decide anyway.