Hang on to Your Firefox

(newsonaut.com)

107 points | by speckx 2 hours ago

15 comments

  • autoexec 7 minutes ago
    > Meanwhile, the over thinkers on Hacker News come up with convoluted reasons to hate on Firefox every time the subject arises...Firefox is our last best hope for browser engine diversity and competition.

    It's exactly because Firefox is so important that you'll see people here complaining when Firefox does things to push away users like Mozilla buying up an ad-tech company, collecting data on users, and using firefox to push personalized ads, or the addition of anti-features and questionable design choices that force us to hunt for and modify poorly documented settings about:config and make edits to userChrome.css

    It isn't bots complaining about Firefox here, it's power users who are frustrated by what Firefox is turning into, users who are seriously concerned about Mozilla is prioritizing, and users who are worried about what is at stake.

    I hope people here never stop bitching about Firefox. Refusing to talk about Firefox's problems wont help make them go away. Keep discussing what you'd like to see in Firefox and what things you hope they'll focus on and prioritize. There are Firefox devs and mozilla employees around here. If we're lucky, a few of them might see and listen to some of what we say. It's the most tech savvy users who disable all the telemetry and data collection, so our feedback isn't really going to be seen any other way.

  • gboss 1 minute ago
    I'm an avid Firefox user, but it seems that Firefox keeps getting worse. Pages forever load, when the issue does not happen in Chrome. History gets corrupted. Claude wouldn't load consistently if I had more than one tab of claude opened internal tools that used to work fine and we haven't updated struggle. I don't know if it's me but it's certainly maddening, especially when I go to Chrome on the same laptop and it just loads.
  • hx8 49 minutes ago
    I am under the impression that Firefox is the only web browser which has access to quality ad blocker. Am I incorrect in this? How is this not enough of a selling point for everyone to switch to it?
    • bikelang 7 minutes ago
      I’ve never been enough of a uBO power user to say conclusively - but I am extremely satisfied with Brave - in particular its ad blocking on YouTube. I also think Brave is by far the best ad block available on iOS.
    • curt15 36 minutes ago
    • cm2187 31 minutes ago
      Agree, and not just that, it allows to escape the hijack of your right click (something google does not tolerate), but they also degraded a lot the experience the last year or two. Number of modal dialog boxes every time it updates (and of course repeat for how many machines you use), also every time there is a pending update, the performance seems to degrade until you close and update, and those updates are very frequent. I don't know if it is my machine but it seems to be struggling when there is more than 2 or 3 video streams on different tabs (increasingly common now that every news websites seems compelled to live stream video on their front page whether you want it or not).
    • senfiaj 43 minutes ago
      Yeah, and when you think about the insane complexity of Web standards, and the fact that even Microsoft failed to create a browser with an independent engine, we are very unlikely to see a new browser engine: https://waspdev.com/articles/2025-04-07/will-there-be-a-new-... . This means that not only we are unlikely to see browsers with new engines but also that the existing browser engine diversity might even shrink if a browser becomes underfunded and / or loses a critical number of users / web developers.
      • happytoexplain 13 minutes ago
        "even Microsoft" is an oxymoron. Microsoft is exactly the entity I would expect to fail at implementing complex standards.
      • TimTheTinker 40 minutes ago
        Ladybird is steadily progressing: https://ladybird.org/
        • cyberax 20 minutes ago
          The last time I checked the source code, it was filled with horrible unsafe C++. They also re-implement everything whether it is needed or not.
      • cyberax 19 minutes ago
        Servo exists, and it's making steady progress: https://servo.org/
    • Cider9986 4 minutes ago
      [delayed]
    • happytoexplain 17 minutes ago
      Only? No. Best? Yes, it's not even close.

      I got the Chrome extension that adds the "Open in Firefox" option to the hyperlink right-click menu. That's how I view all YouTube videos.

      I'd switch completely to Firefox except for all my data being on Google. It's clear that eventually I will switch to Firefox completely.

      Google is pure evil.

      • MrDrMcCoy 11 minutes ago
        Why not migrate your data off? As far as browser stuff goes, it's not that hard of a switch.
        • happytoexplain 8 minutes ago
          Laziness.

          Also I swear YouTube runs much worse on FF. But that's secondary.

    • TimTheTinker 44 minutes ago
      uBlock Origin (non-lite) only works on Firefox as far as I know. Brave purportedly has a built-in ad blocker that uses the same lists, but I can't vouch for it personally.
    • MrDrMcCoy 14 minutes ago
      Brave's adblocker is pretty good, but their means of syncing browsers has kept me away.
    • mhitza 40 minutes ago
      Brave's adblocker does a good job. As far as I know Firefox started using some of the Rust written components of that engine.

      Interestingly on fingerprinting test websites, Brave also did significantly better than Firefox + PrivacyBadger + ublock Origin + one or two more which I forgot. When I ran some tests a couple months back.

    • cromka 40 minutes ago
      Brave is even better since the ad engine is actually built in (lower level) and written in Rust if memory serves me well. And before anyone says anything about crypto: pay a small fee for Brave Origin or use it for free on Linux.
    • cube00 25 minutes ago
      Some people seem to enjoy ads, maybe they feel like they'll be first to know about the next hot thing.

      Just look at how many people pump positive comments into influencer's posts that are nothing more then ads (sorry, collaborations). While some are bots, plenty seem real.

      Or the new local takeaway that's just opened and all the reviews saying "I keep seeing this place appear so I had to check it out"

    • grebc 17 minutes ago
      NoScript works well enough just wholesale blocking js.
    • kevinmgranger 23 minutes ago
      I've heard good things about Orion (WebKit)
      • MrDrMcCoy 15 minutes ago
        It's still unusable on Linux, but I like where it's going.
    • chr-s 45 minutes ago
      I'm using Safari w/ AdGuard and it seems to work OK.
    • Mashimo 37 minutes ago
      uBlock lite is enough for me. I switched from normal to lite and did not notice a difference.
      • bluebarbet 24 minutes ago
        With this attitude you can expect uBlock Ultra-Lite and then uBlock Nothing in future. Mozilla is the only remaining obstacle to stop big tech from deciding everything about how the web is rendered. If we don't support Firefox we will get what we deserve.
      • cube00 12 minutes ago
        Just wait until Manifest V4 then Manifest V5.
  • trashcan_man 6 minutes ago
    It seems like the Browser Wars are going to converge on a singular point: "Do I need to access Big Tech services?"

    As long as the business world is going to continue centrallizing on the likes of Microsoft, Google, and Cloudflare, any existing or future alternative browsers will either have to kowtow on the alter of compatibility or make the deliberate decision not to support "advanced features" that enable the next generation of proprietary webmail, social media, banking webpages, etc - tending towards a total revocation of privacy in exchange for KYC via a glut of metadata.

    This will get even crappier as mechanisms used to filter out "suspicious" traffic (read: competing products) become standard. I imagine using Firefox in 2030 will be akin to using Tor in 2019 - web requests will be blocked, denied, or deemed "insecure".

    Lynx revolution when?

  • thebiblelover7 32 minutes ago
    Related: There's also Ladybird that is developing quickly and is aiming for an alpha release this year. It's a truly independent browser engine built from scratch.

    https://ladybird.org/

    • SirHumphrey 6 minutes ago
      This is mentioned under every Firefox discussion despite being possibly years away from being generally useful if the will ever progress to that point.

      It’s not really a feasible alternative.

  • Nail2680 24 minutes ago
    Firefox is the best of a bunch of bad options, but isn't above critique. It does suck when they do anticonsumer stuff and shove weird stuff like pocket in, but you can't leave which makes it similar to the democratic party where you can't really do anything, but they keep making really poor decisions.
    • lioeters 13 minutes ago
      The similarity goes deeper since they're funded by the very thing they claim to oppose.
    • dyauspitr 22 minutes ago
      Pocket was awesome. I am sad it’s gone and even though I found replacements I just don’t use them as much as pocket.
  • willjp 2 minutes ago
    Wait, is this a thing?

    Why do people hate firefox? It's the only mainstream browser with an rcfile?

  • theamk 1 hour ago
    I am using firefox, but it is pretty hard to keep using it. I don't want the whole world to converge on one browser engine, but I also want things to work, and Firefox does not make it easy.

    Firefox on my laptop has a propensity for eating lots of RAM, and constant CPU usage, even if nothing is going on. Task manager is useless. Profiler just shows "GC collecting".

    Mobile firefox is OK, it simply feels like it's designed for a different person. For example even Chrome has "force reader mode" button.. Firefox does not. And don't even get me started on the "new tab" [age - it gives me 6 choices and all of them are "AI" ones which never show what I want. The only way to show a manually curated link list is "collections" and those do not get synced, and occasionally disappear for no reason.

    • opan 1 minute ago
      >Mobile firefox is OK, it simply feels like it's designed for a different person. For example even Chrome has "force reader mode" button.. Firefox does not.

      I'm using Fennec from F-Droid, but I have a little document symbol on the URL bar I tap for reader mode. I guess the issue is it doesn't show on all sites then?

    • glaucon 21 minutes ago
      I don't know why but I have a different experience. My daily driver is a 13 year old Thinkpad with 16Gb memory, I use Firefox all the time, I routinely have 50+ tabs open, I really have no complaints.

      I also use Firefox on Android, I have less experience of using other browsers on mobile but what I've got is fine for me.

      I'm not questioning your experience but I would like others, who might be considering using Firefox, to know that different people have different experiences.

    • mingus88 37 minutes ago
      I don’t know you, but most people I work with for some reason keep so many tabs open, the tab bar is squeezed so you can barely see a favicon

      Probably due to my age, I religiously close every tab after I read it. If that gets more than a dozen, I literally quit the browser and declare bankruptcy because it’s not worth it to sort through the mess of tabs I clearly am not using.

      Firefox is old too. I’m sure it could manage memory better, but couldn’t we all? If you have tabs in GC and using CPU when you aren’t using them, kill them maybe? What else is that tab doing all day when you aren’t looking?

      I’ve never understood why people keep so many tabs open and why they’ll literally switch to an entirely different browser platform rather than change a bad habit

      • cosmic_cheese 8 minutes ago
        I'm around middle age and keep tons of tabs open simply because I have a number of projects/tasks or soon-to-be projects/tasks going at any given point and managing associated websites is easier with tabs than it is with bookmarks. In other words, bookmark management UI/UX is inadequate and tab hoarding is the band-aid.

        There's also a higher chance that things will slip through the cracks and be forgotten if I bookmark them, whereas with tabs they're staring me in the face any time I'm using my computer.

      • peri-cl 19 minutes ago
        I wish I had that level of executive functioning. I open tabs at a high branching rate, and faster than I have the impulse control to (for lack of a better word) run a garbage-collection pass over what I'd just done.

        When it balloons into the low thousands and starts hurting performance, I dump Firefox's open-tabs store (file called recovery.jsonlz4) into a different file and start over. At some point I'll point an LLM at that junk pile and see if I missed anything important. (Probably not).

  • glimshe 22 minutes ago
    I gave Firefox a chance as my PDF reader as it has a pretty efficient engine. But that didn't work out as I don't need to read PDFs so often so every time it launched, it ran an update that added 10s to reading the PDF... :/

    My current main browser across desktop and mobile is Brave. Pretty happy with it. Overall more efficient and with a better UI than FF. I've used FF for many years, but I feel it's simply not as good as competitors anymore.

    • grebc 16 minutes ago
      You will not beat SumatraPDF for speed of opening & reading PDF's.
    • layer8 21 minutes ago
      I’d recommend using a dedicated PDF reader in any case.
      • gnyeki 10 minutes ago
        One advantage of Firefox's PDF reader is that it is sandboxed which a dedicated PDF reader typically isn't AFAIK.
      • TremendousJudge 16 minutes ago
        I use SumatraPDF for reading, but it doesn't do editing. The Firefox PDF editor works perfectly fine.
  • nubinetwork 51 minutes ago
    Firefox used to be amazing, but they squandered their market share with bad decisions and stagnation. Maybe one day they'll see the light, but not likely, given their recent ai additions...
    • soperj 40 minutes ago
      They were competing with the biggest advertiser in the world who put an ad about their own browser on the front page of the biggest search engine in the world. Not sure it was entirely their own doing.
      • kova12 20 minutes ago
        Wasn't something in their new ToS that turned many of us against them? I don't think advertisement was the issue
    • TimTheTinker 41 minutes ago
      Rumors of Firefox's death have been circling for at least 15 years now... somehow it's kept going despite odd incentives and bad corporate decisions.
      • 1970-01-01 17 minutes ago
        Both can be true. Progressing without innovation only works when your product is Coca-Cola or Bic lighters. FireFox as a name or brand is nowhere near it's former v1.0-3.0 glory days.
  • matheusmoreira 30 minutes ago
    The problem is Mozilla, not Firefox.
  • _jackdk_ 36 minutes ago
    Firefox is great, and I use and recommend it as daily driver, but the actions of Mozilla leadership are really hard to differentiate from deliberately managed decline. It will be interesting to see what happens as Ladybird matures.
  • palata 2 hours ago
    People just don't care. They are happy with monopolies and surveillance capitalism.

    Once in a while someone talks about digital sovereignty, but much like climate change, nothing will be done (successfully) about it.

    That's how it is, I've come to terms with it.

    • bluebarbet 19 minutes ago
      Agreed. All the more reason to do what we can to make things better than they otherwise would be. Outcomes are never black and white.
    • sssilver 41 minutes ago
      I'm not sure why this is being downvoted.

      Do people care? What signs of this are there?

      Does it matter to the average person that the society is marching further and further down the road of digital monopolies and surveillance capitalism? My impression certainly is that the percentage of people who care about this is so small that it might as well be a rounding error, while on the other side I see tremendous momentum, effort, and cunning.

  • firefax 52 minutes ago
    i like noscript
  • fitsumbelay 26 minutes ago
    > The over thinkers on Hacker News

    Can barely keep my eyes socketed from all this involuntary rolling that's overtaken them ...

    I'm personally here for the non-bullshit stuff that isn't about getting clicks with hot ledes grounded on warmed over, barely modified well worn takes on well-understood stats so miss me with _that_ shit ...