7 comments

  • bazoom42 41 minutes ago
    Of course the the theory is wrong:

    > new investigations since the 1960s have discredited Hawkins' ideas.

  • ehecatl42 22 minutes ago
    It's clearly either a giant granite birthday cake... or a prison far too easy to escape.
  • 2OEH8eoCRo0 49 minutes ago
    No one knows who they were, or what they were doing
    • sjclemmy 5 minutes ago
      When my son and I drive to London, we pass Stonehenge and always play that song. We repeat that line many, many times.
  • jvanderbot 1 hour ago
    At this rate, I would find it startling if ancient stonework didn't have something to do with the sun, moon, and stars. Everywhere you look some ancient society was predicting these things by tracking them.
  • stephbook 52 minutes ago
    Would be pretty stupid to spend all this energy erecting stones just for the view of it.

    Like, it obviously had SOME purpose.

    • cogman10 33 minutes ago
      What's interesting is that it may have had multiple changing purposes during construction.

      It took 1500 years to be established in its current form. It's pretty likely (to me at least) that the purpose of the year 1 work was different from year 1500.

    • bux93 9 minutes ago
      It was probably a tribe that later emigrated to Australia

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_things_(Australia)

    • spicyusername 11 minutes ago
      My favorite theory is that nomadic civilizations during that period were known to congregate together temporarily throughout the year.

      Stonehenge was one of the places they would do this.

      Makes sense to make the meeting spot nice.

    • dilawar 30 minutes ago
      Or someone told them that folks in Egypt made a huge building out of stones. They started and gave up after a while. As good a story as any?
    • malfist 40 minutes ago
      Yeah, why did they go through all that effort to build the Eiffel tower?
      • billynomates 37 minutes ago
        It honored the 100th anniversary of the French Revolution. And it demonstrated French industrial prowess, iron craftsmanship advanced engineering capabilities..
        • uniq7 10 minutes ago
          I wonder if Stonehenge was only for demonstrating some tribe's engineering capabilities too
        • ralfd 33 minutes ago
          Furthermore: The Eiffel Tower was planned to be temporary, it only still stands because it was used as a radio tower.
    • alephnerd 20 minutes ago
      > Would be pretty stupid to spend all this energy erecting stones just for the view of it

      I think the same way looking at medieval cathedrals or Roman and Greek era theatres, collesiums, and agoras...

      At least the Ottomans used the Parthenon as an arms depot, giving those stones some meaning.

      (This is sarcasm)

      • theodric 17 minutes ago
        It wasn't "for the view," it was, in no particular order, and non-exhaustively:

        * To provide work * To serve as a reminder of the power and authority of the church * To glorify God * To make sure all the other nearby kingdoms were aware of how much cooler you are than them

        • IAmBroom 1 minute ago
          > * To provide work

          Cite required. Work in a pre-industrial agrarian society is ever-present, unless there's a drought. (Although in that case the coffin builders may need extra hands.)

        • alephnerd 15 minutes ago
          sarcasm (noun) - the use of words that mean the opposite of what one intends to say especially in order to insult, to show irritation, or to be funny : a mode of satirical wit depending for its effect on ironic and usually bitter and caustic language often directed against an individual or idea.
  • DarmokTanagra 1 hour ago
    it was actually a doorbell
  • k33n 53 minutes ago
    “The BBC, without evidence, claims that Stonehenge may have been a prehistoric computer”
    • bazoom42 37 minutes ago
      The BBC does not actually claim that.
    • DarmokTanagra 37 minutes ago
      laughs in Egyptian