3 comments

  • microtonal 29 minutes ago
    Is the actual text of the workplan somewhere? The linked article refers to the text

    more effective tools for law enforcement

    in the press release and then infers or implies that this means more encryption backdoors, but I could not find that in an actual EU text?

    (Edit: I'm not doubting that they want to make backdoors mandatory, I'd just like to see the actual text.)

    • petre 23 minutes ago
      It's linked in the second paragraph of article.

        More effective tools for law enforcement and stronger JHA agencies
      
        Law enforcement needs the right tools to be effective. And with 85% of criminal investigations relying on digital information, this includes lawful access to data:
      
        …
        · A Roadmap on lawful and effective access to data for law enforcement,
        · A Technology Roadmap on encryption, and an impact assessment with a view to updating the EU's data retention rules.
      
      This is pushing for encryption backdoors in eurocrat speech: lawful access to data, roadmap, impact assesment, updating rules.
      • microtonal 9 minutes ago
        What you are citing from is an older press release from April 2025.
  • jruohonen 42 minutes ago
    Google "security despite encryption" etc. It is some good rhetorical manipulation a'la EU over again.
    • dgellow 27 minutes ago
      We see it in the EU here but the groups pushing for that are everywhere, including the US, UK, Australia, etc

      So frustrating to go though that exact same debate every few years

      • microtonal 25 minutes ago
        Indeed. This is also why we should resist getting locked further into the Apple/Google duopoly. In such closed systems it will be straightforward to require backdoors. Much harder if we have general-purpose computers that we can run our own software on.
        • nerdalytics 8 minutes ago
          That's why for wallet features only Apple and Google are allowed. Condition everyone picking only iOS or Android, but not Linux, or others.
  • miroljub 13 minutes ago
    Only a fascist like totalitarian government would keep pushing for more and control and les freedoms.

    Their biggest ploy was they convicted people 1984 was a description of a communist dictatorship, and not an execution manual for European democracies on how to strengthen their grips.

    • tokai 3 minutes ago
      I'm so tired of reading stuff like this under any article covering the political struggle over surveillance in EU. While US posts about surveilling journalists, letting 'law' enforcement run wild with no oversight, and so on, either gets flagged to death or talked down.
      • baal80spam 1 minute ago
        Funny, I see something completely opposite.