Superconducting monolayer cuprate with a single CuO2 plane

 (nature.com)

21 points | by sbulaev 3 days ago

2 comments

  • iandanforth 54 minutes ago
    The writing here seems very odd. It reads like a product announcement or blog page, not an article in Nature. I'm left questioning its validity.
    [-]
    • ironqcold 1 minute ago
      I noticed that too.The writing style itself seems a bit strange. I'm not deep into superconductors, so I can't judge the science itself but I have doubts about how much trust this article can give.
    • pama 40 minutes ago
      Hmm. I didn’t get that impression from a quick skim. Just curious: what makes you think that?
      [-]
      • kzrdude 34 minutes ago
        I would guess it's the 'vast' and the 'unprecedented' for example.
  • oliculipolicula 1 day ago
    That was fun but this is gun?

    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-026-03375-4

    The two teams could "synergize" their tacit knowledge, overcome "involution"?

    Without open peer review like in the old days it's hard, even with frontier models, for nonexperts to know if the above breakthrough was (unfairly?) relegated or how significant TFA is truly

    [-]