Arguably, a more interesting, revealing, and kinder question is; "What have you been curious about?".
I feel a looking-back-to-curiosity exercise has power to shed light on where to look ahead (and why to do it). More so, I feel it has power to grant permission to that "insatiably curious thirteen year old self" to step out and play. Because it probably already has been up to something, while your attention was elsewhere.
So, here is a prompt (see what I just did there? ;-))
Um... Except for LLM stuff, if you please. Just for this thread. Because these days the plurality of HN discussion appears to be about the curiosities of LLMs.
(cf. More about this in a blog post I published a while back https://www.evalapply.org/posts/what-have-you-been-curious-about/ )
Then I noticed that one of the violinists was leading the other musicians while playing, through eye contact, body movement, and the music itself. Only after looking him up later did I learn that it was Julien Chauvin's ensemble, and that this was simply how they performed.
I ended up watching Julien Chauvin and his ensemble for a full hour. It went by in no time.
I am curious about impressionist paintings. It's my favourite art style but I struggle to replicate it on canvas. I'm glad that there are so many helpful YouTube art teachers now.
I have made elderflower cordial from harvested flowers, and it both got me into cocktails/mocktails, and tracking what else I can harvest throughout the year. Having garden flowers in the house and wild blackberry cakes is such a nice way to observe the passage of time.
The book Virtual Barrels by Ilia Bouchouev.
The details and mechanics of financial option pricing.
Any specific resources you're using?
Speaking for myself, I have far many more active topics I'm curious about, than I can possibly do anything about. Curiosity just because is fulfilling in its own way.
No expectations of course. If you later decide this angle will add noise and/or too many tangents to your Ask HN, please drop it forthwith.
Thanks for the offer... cheers!
It’s only like 70 pages and it’s basically just him comparing how computers and neurons work and speculating on some stuff.
The general takeaway seemed to be that the brain looks digital at first glance (binary activation of neurons) but is actually a lot more complicated and more like a mix of analog/digital.
Now I’m really curious if there are any other modern books that do this comparison more in depth, basically exploring how a brain works but the author has a CS or EE background
This book is from the 50s so I’m sure a lot has changed since then.