Vivaldi 8.0

(vivaldi.com)

86 points | by OuterVale 1 hour ago

15 comments

  • michelsedgh 1 minute ago
    Wait so you make a big announcement talking about a full new redesign but dont actually show a demo? That should be illegal
  • portmanteaufu 57 minutes ago
    I'd like to try Vivaldi, but the combination of being (partially) closed-source [1] and free-as-in-beer makes me feel like I must be the product.

    Do they do any sort of third-party auditing of the closed parts?

    [1] https://vivaldi.com/blog/technology/why-isnt-vivaldi-browser...

    • dijksterhuis 36 minutes ago
      source code is apparently* available to audit: https://vivaldi.com/source

      * on my phone, can’t inspect the tars

      • brnt 23 minutes ago
        Tarballs every 2 months, and we know these don't give you the Vivaldi browser as they supply it.

        I don't trust them one bit. There was that telemetry analysis that showed Vivaldi as a very noisy browser.

        • dijksterhuis 22 minutes ago
          > we know these don't give you the Vivaldi browser as they supply it.

          how so? how do you know this?

    • dgellow 53 minutes ago
      Im not sure I understand their business model. I don’t see any paid offering on their website
      • newscombinatorY 44 minutes ago
        Took 2 seconds to startpage* this: https://vivaldi.com/blog/vivaldi-business-model/

        *screw Google and their AI search

        • dgellow 23 minutes ago
          Guess I’m blind, I somehow missed it… thanks!

          So the answer seems to be:

          - search partnerships

          - direct match partnerships

          - bookmarks partnerships

          - donation

          - cut when people sign up for advertised products (proton vpn, not sure if others)

          Or at least that was the case in 2019

      • zamadatix 47 minutes ago
        Search engine deals are HUGE for browsers. They're e.g. what has funded Mozilla with many billions over the last 20 years. Mozilla has tried to diversify but everything else has pales in comparison (and the donations are basically a joke).

        It scales up with usage as well. Not that Safari needed funding, but Google pays Apple upwards of $20,000,000,000 per year for the privilege of being the default for that user base.

  • adrian_b 36 minutes ago
    With Firefox, especially with Firefox on Linux, which always had and still has poor GPU support, I frequently encounter sites that do not work well or they do not work at all. So I must keep a backup browser, which is normally Vivaldi, because typically any site that works in Chrome also works in Vivaldi.

    Moreover, Vivaldi has a great advantage over both Firefox and Chrome, in it the command to print a Web page usually works fine, while in both Firefox and Chrome it almost never works correctly.

    Both Firefox and Chrome are almost never able to render correctly a "printed" page, even if they render the same page perfectly on screen. In the printed page, the graphic elements have almost always wrong sizes, which results in overlapped or invisible page elements. I suppose that this is caused by the fact that many Web pages stupidly use element sizes in pixels, instead of using length units, e.g. points or inches or mm, and both Firefox and Chrome might scale pixels wrongly when rendering for resolutions that differ from that of the screen, while Vivaldi scales them correctly.

    Besides the "Print" command, the second feature that I like in Vivaldi better than in Firefox or Chrome is that it accepts mouse gestures for most commands, as alternatives to keyboard shortcuts, so you do not need to move the hand from the mouse while browsing.

    • netsharc 14 minutes ago
      > mouse gestures

      Vivaldi is born made by the same people who left Opera after it was bought by a Chinese company, and the mouse gestures are similar. Ny favorites: "Hold right mouse button, click left" is the browser back gesture, and "hold left, click right" is forward.

    • dmos62 13 minutes ago
      I ran into broken printing when I was trying to turn web pages into PDFs. Both Chrome and Firefox couldn't "print" without breaking layout.
    • dijksterhuis 24 minutes ago
      > the second feature that I like in Vivaldi better than in Firefox or Chrome is that it accepts mouse gestures for most commands

      vivaldi was doing something weird for me, can’t exactly remember what now. seemingly unprompted it would switch tabs or go back in history or something.

      turns out i’d tried to be clever, set up a mouse gesture and forgotten about it. xD

  • xerox13ster 35 minutes ago
    I have been using Vivaldi since it was an alpha build. It is the best browser hands down IMO. I have been here for the entire ride. I am so glad to see that there is not AI bundled in this release, which has been a major concern for me when anticipating future releases of this browser.

    I hope they keep it up.

  • zamadatix 27 minutes ago
    I always liked Vivaldi's simple+autohide layout. Unfortunately, the 3-4 times I tried to use it over the years I always ended up giving up due to random performance regressions over stock Chromium. It's been a few versions now though, maybe it's worth a go again.
  • aucisson_masque 1 hour ago
    Vivaldi is all about customization but then they categorically refuse to add extension support to their android browser.

    Imo extension is the ultimate way to customize your browser experience.

    It's not technical difficulties, there are open source projects that have such support.

    I also don't believe it's against any TOS because some of these browser are available in the Google play store.

    I just don't get why they refuse to do that.

    • hvb2 1 hour ago
      Because of stuff like this? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48207660

      If you don't have the ability to police extensions you're basically putting your users up for sale?

      • joshuaissac 58 minutes ago
        But they support extensions on desktop.

        The problem you linked to also happened on desktop because there is no VSCode for phones.

      • atraac 58 minutes ago
        Your users don't have to use those extensions, so I don't understand how that's relevant? People who do, should be made aware of risks and that's it. This is not a good argument against taking away their option to have that customization.
        • hvb2 10 minutes ago
          I'm having a hard time finding a thread where people don't complain about npm when the real issue is packages being compromised.

          Swap packages for extensions in the above and let me know how that's different

      • eviks 55 minutes ago
        No, if that were true, there would be no extension support on non-mobile
  • mrweasel 44 minutes ago
    It's a lovely browser, and a lot of work has clearly been put into it. I should like it, because I used Opera for ages (in the Presto era), but it's just a little to busy for me.

    There's way to much stuff, to many feature and when the rendering engine is just Blink, I don't really see much of a reason to use it over Firefox.

    Nice work though and wonderful to see a 3rd party browser maker giving it a go.

  • Barbing 1 hour ago
    Respect the tremendous amount of work that went into this!

    I appreciate the intention to protect my privacy. How does that square with Manifest V2 deprecation as dictated by the adtech company (Google)?

    Also, for years I’ve been uncomfortable using Chromium as I’m uncomfortable raising that statistic any more, since I don’t want the Internet to be designed for one particular engine. Maybe Vivaldi 9.0 will be the biggest design overhaul of all time and even refactor based on Gecko like Firefox :)

  • dragochat 14 minutes ago
    still as bloated as ever?

    can't we just have tabs + tiling (either tiles in tabs, or tabs in tiles, both can work), and call it a day?

    that's all I need from browsing today

  • rjzzleep 34 minutes ago
    Every time I try use Vivaldi I encounter how incredibly slow the UI is. Are all Vivaldi users running it on specced out desktops? Or is it just ao lineux UI latency issue?
  • ahofmann 1 hour ago
    Vivaldi is the browser, where I always wonder why it doesn't get mentioned in all the privacy enhanced browsers. It's the only browser for me, that reliably filters out all ads with ublock origin while working on all websites without any problems. Also the company behind Vivaldi is not in USA/China/Russia, which also helps from my point of view.
    • turblety 49 minutes ago
      Because it's a proprietary closed source fork of Google Chromium. There's nothing to trust. If it's free and closed source, you are the product.
  • eviks 57 minutes ago
    > If you have been using Vivaldi for years, you have your setup exactly as you want it and you would not trade it for anything.

    You wouldn't be able to even if you wanted because there is no good way to export/import your changes for the trade to happen

    Otherwise removing a few borders seems a bit underwhelming for a major version bump

  • self_awareness 16 minutes ago
    I was an Opera user for years. Now I'm a Vivaldi user also since a long time. Best browser, FF/Chrome doesn't come close.
  • Bingflatops 1 hour ago
    Looks way better and almost everything is quite cohesive but then they add the weird arrow with an uggly box around it in the top right.
    • sagacity 23 minutes ago
      You can just right-click and hide it, though.
  • ktallett 39 minutes ago
    Two questions, how can you trust closed source? And how are they already on release 8.0; what are these significant improvement each time or is it like apple's yearly release?
    • sevg 35 minutes ago
      If version 8.0 makes you raise your eyebrows, just wait til you see what version Firefox and Chrome are on!
      • ktallett 10 minutes ago
        Which is even more nuts, especially with the features removed from Firefox sometimes like the grouped tabs removal then regain.