2 comments

  • pocksuppet 1 hour ago
    Humanoid robots are publicity stunts. They are not well-designed for any task. Humans relate to them because they look like humans. That's it.

    Robot-shaped robots have been doing factory work for much longer than 30 hours at a time for decades.

    You don't need a humanoid robot to use computer vision to sort packages. Robots at mail sorting facilities have been doing that for decades too. The most effective way to sort a package is some sort of diverter that swings out diagonally across a conveyor belt, so the package falls off the side at that location, into a collection basket or onto another conveyor belt.

    Also, this article is paid advertising.

    • skywal_l 32 minutes ago
      Yes but they are also a quick win to replace humans because they don't need accommodation or specific R&D. Any job by a human that has no been automated yet is because the ROI was too low to develop a specific robot and adapt the work environment for it.

      The human is basically the standard API. A humanoid robot is a drop-in replacement implementation of this API.

  • Haven880 58 minutes ago
    Nothing burger. Factories in Shenzhen fully automated with specialized robots running for the past 5 years. Generic humanoid robots not going to outperform those specialized robots.
    • kgeist 33 minutes ago
      Generic robots are potentially faster to configure and set up in many different environments, and they're more accessible, no? If I wanted a specialized robot right now for my small business, I'm not even sure where to begin. But if I could just order a bunch of generic robots off Amazon and tell them what to do, that would be great. Sure, specialized robots would outperform them, but for many tasks, that would be overkill.