5 comments

  • adjejmxbdjdn 1 hour ago
    Electrification is a no brainer.

    Electricity is essentially an abstraction layer that decouples the source of energy from the consumer.

    Even if you want to remain 100% fossil fuel dependent, it still makes a lot more sense, outside of some industrial uses, to generate electricity with those fossil fuels and then use the electricity to power your actual device, whether it’s your air conditioning unit or your automobile, than to ship liquid gas to hundreds of thousands of gas stations all over or build pipes to send gaseous natural gas to every house.

    Not only is it more efficient, as any abstracted system, it allows far more flexibility and resilience due to that flexibility.

    • anon7000 15 minutes ago
      100%. Also, fossil fuel is a bit ridiculous compared to renewables because you have to spend a huge amount of effort to find a new resource patch, extract the fuel, ship it all over the planet… just to burn it and it’s gone forever. Not a sustainable system for our energy at all.
  • belviewreview 2 hours ago
    Remember how fossil fuel promoters always say its big advantage over solar and wind energy is reliability?
  • dzhiurgis 37 minutes ago
    Interesting timing that China is ending solar panel and battery export subsidies this year.

    Panel I've bought 15 months ago is 20% more expensive now.

  • ChrisArchitect 3 hours ago
    Some discussions:

    Heat pump sales rise across Europe

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48012003

    Iran war sparks renewables boom as Europeans rush to buy solar, heat pumps, EVs

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47601310

  • Ati985 2 hours ago
    I can’t say too much, but electricity and petroleum are only temporary energy sources for me. Once waste heat can be turned into usable energy, electricity becomes cyclic. Through energy recovery, electricity can produce fuel, and fuel can be converted back into electricity, forming an energy‑conversion loop. The only drawback is that the system can recover only 98.04% of the energy, which is not what I originally designed. If this were a phone battery, my initial design was that a phone would never need permanent charging again. Now it seems it might need to be charged once every six months or a year. All of this was originally designed for my future long‑term stay on Mars — I never intended to implement it on Earth
    • anon7000 12 minutes ago
      You look like an AI bot. Someone should report you
    • belviewreview 2 hours ago
      Recover 98.04% of waste heat energy? That may follow the 1st Law of Thermodynamics, but it definitely violates the 2nd.
    • seventytwo 2 hours ago
      Seems legit
    • bastawhiz 2 hours ago
      Julius Robert von Mayer has entered the chat