Show HN: Hallucinopedia

(halupedia.com)

42 points | by bstrama 1 hour ago

17 comments

  • driggs 6 minutes ago
    This is fantastic. I couldn't find any obvious way to search for a new page, but you can simply bang out any arbitrary URL slug and the new article will be hallucinated fresh, eg:

    https://halupedia.com/shortest-cave-in-the-world

    https://halupedia.com/echolocation-ability-in-spiders

    • bstrama 4 minutes ago
      Exactly, but I consider adding fake search that could find you ANY article, including not existent ones
  • jijilao 0 minutes ago
    wtf, I thought these were just anecdotes until I saw they were actually happening in Astoria. I used to visit in the summers and never heard about any of that! Stop the fake news
  • diputsmonro 22 minutes ago
    It's pretty fun to poke at! Although it's certainly difficult to be exact, it would be neat if generated pages used the context of the pages they were linked from (ideally, all pages that link to it) to guide the direction of the page. From the ones I generated it seemed they were mostly independent.
    • bstrama 18 minutes ago
      Yeah, thought about that, maybe will implement it. Will keep in mind! For now SSR to feed LLMs' the priority
  • lxgr 39 minutes ago
    Ironically, this seems much faster (for pages already, erm, "researched") than the real one! How?
    • bstrama 27 minutes ago
      It generates articles only once. So once it's generated, it never perish. Logic looks like: If article exist -> show it If not -> generate and save
      • lxgr 12 minutes ago
        I get that, but how does it serve the generated and cached ones seemingly faster than Wikipedia? (My guess is that single-page applications, which this one seems to be, just need less round trips between navigations or something?)
        • bstrama 5 minutes ago
          Yep, just a react. Also we use gemini 2.5 flash lite, so it's fast, cheap and dumb.
  • JohnMakin 52 minutes ago
    Funny, but you could argue this is actively harmful to the web.
    • r3trohack3r 14 minutes ago
      Interesting, but you could argue comments like this are actively harmful to the web.
      • AlecSchueler 8 minutes ago
        But the argument wouldn't be nearly as strong.
    • isoprophlex 44 minutes ago
      The sooner the current web dies, the better. Something better either rises from its ashes, or we lose... something that was already lost.
      • b00ty4breakfast 14 minutes ago
        or something way worse shows up.
        • JohnMakin 9 minutes ago
          Yea, I'm not sure how the "this is really bad so let's make it worse" argument really makes any sense
    • dayofthedaleks 39 minutes ago
      You could also argue that the web has failed and poisoning it into irrelevance is a vital service, motivating humans to collect knowledge into immutable sources. We‘ll call them ‘libraries.’
    • lxgr 37 minutes ago
      On the other hand, one could argue that anything that can be destroyed by relatively clearly labeled satire, deserves to be.
    • stronglikedan 42 minutes ago
      > you could argue

      Could you? I don't see it happening, but I could be wrong.

    • slig 28 minutes ago
      Grokipedia is already doing that.
    • parliament32 22 minutes ago
      To the web? It's fantastic for the web, these are the kinds of fun projects that make the web a worthwhile place to be. To slop generators? Yes, absolutely harmful, and that's for the best.
    • Jtarii 35 minutes ago
      Pissing on a pile of shit
  • petercooper 1 hour ago
    Give it a week and see what Google AI Overview has to say about the Great Pigeon Census of 1887!
  • throw310822 2 minutes ago
    Funny. Small improvement suggestion: the entry about "Glorbonian culinary arts" links to "the subterranean nation of Glorbonia". However upon clicking the link to "Glorbonia", an entry is generated claiming that "Glorbonia refers to a peculiar and largely uncatalogued form of sub-auditory resonance". It would be cool if some context were carried over from the referrer page so that there is some coherence between entries (ah, and some existing entries could be taken in account when generating new ones).
  • solarkraft 40 minutes ago
    Finally a more trustworthy version of Grokipedia!
    • bstrama 39 minutes ago
      It's hilarious, you made my day hahah
    • LeoPanthera 32 minutes ago
      I honestly forgot that Grokipedia existed. Did anyone ever use it?
      • bstrama 25 minutes ago
        Tried once, but was useless. Very funny that it had so many text, while Elon is apparently "huge" fan of short and precise communication...
  • bstrama 1 hour ago
    Can't wait to see the next generation of LLMs after feeding it all of that hahaha
    • everyos_ 47 minutes ago
      The page requires JS to load its content - user agents without JS support just get a blank page.

      I'm not sure if the bots that scrape data to train LLMs are capable of loading that type of page, or if they only work on pages that have the content inside the HTML itself?

      • replygirl 43 minutes ago
        any serious scraping service these days will fail over to a headless browser when it fetches an asset referencing a js bundle that isn't verifiably a vendor script
      • m3047 28 minutes ago
        It's entirely possible they simply ingest the JS as-is.
      • bstrama 40 minutes ago
        I'm aware and will implement SSR soon ;)
  • nickvec 43 minutes ago
    Seeing “Something broke, which is ironic for a made-up encyclopedia: Load failed” when trying to access some of the suggested starting points
    • bstrama 41 minutes ago
      Works on my PC.

      Could you gimme the url that's failing?

  • meghneelgore 27 minutes ago
    Great idea! I created an adjacent website that gives, shall we say, "alternative facts" about your questions. (don't know if the rules allow me to link the site so I won't).
  • janwillemb 14 minutes ago
    It's nice, but after a few clicks my LLM content fatigue kicks in.
  • arduanika 23 minutes ago
    Love it! It feels very Borges!

    Feature request: also be able to click on the Talk page to see the controversies. I don't always want to trust the article itself as the final word.

    Edit: Oh look, there's an article about the YC! https://halupedia.com/y-combinator

    • bstrama 16 minutes ago
      Great suggestion! Will immediately look into that!
  • FergusArgyll 23 minutes ago
    Who says llms can't be funny?!
  • dmje 41 minutes ago
    I LOVE IT. Superb.
  • yodon 4 minutes ago
    [flagged]