10 comments

  • theazureguy 3 hours ago
    I got frustrated that every fuel price app just shows you what's cheap nearby. I wanted to know how stations actually behave: do prices go up faster than they come down, do supermarkets really save you much, how bad are motorway prices really?

    So I built a scraper that hits the UK government's mandatory Fuel Finder API every 10 minutes and stores every price change. 90k records across 7,700 stations since January.

    Some things I found that surprised me:

    The rocket and feather effect is real and measurable. When stations raise prices the average move is 2.35p/litre. When they cut, it's 1.85p. There are also more up moves than down moves. I queried the raw history to check this rather than eyeballing a chart.

    Motorway fuel is 28.4p/litre more expensive than everywhere else right now. That's about £14 extra on a 50L fill. Everyone knows motorways are expensive but I didn't expect the gap to be that wide.

    The supermarket discount is only about 1.7p. I assumed it would be bigger.

    Stack is Azure Functions, TimescaleDB, PostGIS, Next.js. The interesting thing about this project is the history. No public site shows how an individual station has priced over time or how a local cluster of stations react to each other. That's what I'm building towards.

    Site: https://fuelinsight.co.uk

    Happy to talk through the architecture or the data if anyone's interested.

    • appreciatorBus 3 hours ago
      Another insightful way to look at this is to include gasoline spot market data as a comparison.

      I kept hearing about the vast profits of gas stations, so one day I started a spreadsheet of my gas purchases and kept it going over 10 years. When I tried lining up the graph of what I have actually paid per litre with a spot market graph, after converting for currency, units, taxes etc, they were almost identical, indicating extremely slim margins, if any. Yes there were differences, places in the graph where stations had likely made money on my purchase, but there were just as many where they likely lost money, unless I also stepped inside to but a snack.

      • jacquesm 2 hours ago
        You are correct. Non-chain gas stations often make only as little as one or two cents per liter, and that's before you look at pump maintenance, inspections, periodical tank replacements/upgrades/liners and other costs.

        Manned stations really need that shop otherwise they'd go bankrupt.

        Chains make a bit more money but mostly because they can play longer games with stock and options on much larger volume buys.

        Source: former gas station owner.

        • spockz 2 hours ago
          And yet I see in earnings that companies like BP and Shell make record profits over increased gas prices. How come that they do profit but the station holders not? Are shell/bp increasing the margin harder and eating the station’s lunch?
          • kitd 2 minutes ago
            The majors that do upstream (taking it out of the ground) as well as downstream (refining and selling it on the forecourt or wholesale) make their profits on the oil markets.

            When crude is high, it's upstream that earns the income. When it's low, it's selling it to the customer.

            Fun fact: when I worked at BP, the product with the highest margin on the forecourts was the Wild Bean coffee.

          • zipy124 30 minutes ago
            A lot of their record earnings come from trading revenues as well, as they all effectively have in-house trading desks to hedge risk.

            Not nearly as much profit as Vitol made but they make large sums too.

          • gostsamo 1 hour ago
            Reuters had a material on the topic. The big producers have trading desks that can optimise based on spot prices and redirect tankers as needed.
          • badpun 1 hour ago
            I think majority of the profits come from extracting the oil from the ground, much less from refining (more competetive - everyone can just build more refineries if margins become high enough), and the least from retail (gas stations).
          • mschuster91 1 hour ago
            > How come that they do profit but the station holders not? Are shell/bp increasing the margin harder and eating the station’s lunch?

            Here in Germany, many stations aren't even involved in selling the gas. That's what that magical line "Verkauf von Kraft- und Schmierstoffen im Namen der <Firma>" on the receipt says - the fuel and oil are on paper/for accounting purposes sold by the oil company whose brand is on the flag.

            Independent gas stations (e.g. in Bavaria, the Allguth chain) exist, and they buy, store, distribute and sell their fuel on their own, but in the end everyone is bound to the same few refineries - virtually all (!) of Eastern Germany, Berlin, the Berlin airport and Western Poland for example depend on the PCK refinery complex in Schwedt [1], in Bavaria 2/3rd of the market is supplied by the two Bayernoil refineries in Vohburg and Neustadt [2], the rest by Gunvor (ex-Esso/Exxonmobil) [3].

            No matter if you are an independent or brand-owned gas station... there is about zero competition on the supply side. It's all the same gas and diesel, the only practical difference is the additives for the ultra-high-octane fuel. And that in turn means very little competition at the pump, and owners of independent gas stations being hit the hardest.

            There's a reason why Allguth stations more resemble a 24/7 supermarket, restaurant and beer hall than a gas station.

            Oh and the supply side competition is pretty bad even for refineries. Refineries are fitted to refine only a specific composition of oil - that's the distinctions sweet/sour and light/heavy. For that reason, the US can't process a bunch of its own oil [4], which means the US is actually dependent on Canada and Mexico [5] to meet its oil product demand. A refinery which, like almost all are, is tuned to a specific country's (or, worse, a specific oil field in a specific country) composition is in a real bind, should the supply chain ever get screwed up. The Russian invasion of Ukraine was bad enough, the Iran war was what could very well be the final, fatal blow to many a refinery, especially in Asia.

            Retrofits are possible to allow a refinery for light sweet oil to process heavy sour oil (i.e. add a sulphur removal stage to deal with that, and a cracking stage to deal with heavier molecules), and it is possible for a refinery that is tooled for heavy sour oil to run on light sweet oil without modification - but it is seriously throwing wrenches into the financials, and that's a blocking issue in our money driven world [6].

            [1] https://www.faz.net/aktuell/wirtschaft/unternehmen/pck-raffi... / https://archive.ph/qtvd8

            [2] https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayernoil

            [3] https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gunvor_Raffinerie_Ingolstadt

            [4] https://www.afpm.org/newsroom/blog/how-much-oil-does-united-...

            [5] https://atlasinstitute.org/heavy-oil-heavy-dependence-how-us...

            [6] https://www.forbes.com/sites/rrapier/2026/04/05/debunking-a-...

          • vkou 1 hour ago
            Opening a gas station is a lot easier than acquiring mineral rights, drilling an oil well, refining that oil, and getting it to market. Oh, and your customers can't just drive across the street to your competitor because they are 1c/litre cheaper.

            There's naturally going to be a lot more friction and a lot less pop-up competition and therefore a lot more margin on the supply side of things.

            The station has no power to raise margin - they are in tight competition with every other low-margin station around them. The suppliers, on the other hand... If they invested into wells that aren't affected by the war 10 years ago, and their competitors haven't (or have, but can't supply all the world's oil needs), and there's a global supply shortage - they have lots of room to raise prices.

      • theazureguy 3 hours ago
        Good shout. DESNZ publishes weekly wholesale rack prices and they are OGL, so there is no barrier there. The interesting bit isn't just showing the gap; it's the propagation lag. Wholesale spikes and pump prices follow within days. Wholesale drops and pump prices take their time. That asymmetry is basically what I built this dataset to measure. Adding the wholesale series as a reference line is on the list.
    • gruez 2 hours ago
      >The rocket and feather effect is real and measurable. When stations raise prices the average move is 2.35p/litre. When they cut, it's 1.85p. There are also more up moves than down moves. I queried the raw history to check this rather than eyeballing a chart.

      Comparing the absolute size of price rises vs drops doesn't make sense, because it could very well be an issue with the underlying price (eg. crude oil or whatever). It seems hardly fair to blame gas stations for being slow to lower prices, when refineries are still also slow to lower prices. Same for blaming refineries when the global market is slow to lower prices.

      • theazureguy 1 hour ago
        yeah that's fair, without wholesale rack prices as a baseline you can't really isolate station behaviour from what's happening upstream.
        • gruez 1 hour ago
          >without wholesale rack prices as a baseline

          The US government publishes data on this (eg. https://www.eia.gov/petroleum/gasdiesel/). The UK government might have something similar. Barring that, you can use Brent crude as a proxy.

    • jonahx 30 minutes ago
      What did you use for the UI widgets, graphs, etc? Looks like tailwind is being used but is the design bespoke or a CSS/dashboard lib?
    • fredoralive 3 hours ago
      For the "supermarket saving", did you include Asda in the supermarket pool, or as a general pool? They seem to be rather less price competitive than other supermarkets, I'd presumably because of the recentish private equity takeover involving petrol station operator Euro Garages meaning they've kinda opted out of the petrol price war (they're hardly likely to want to undercut their existing forecourts).

      Although the other recent private equity takeover of Morrisons led to some sort of deal with Motor Fuels Group to operate their petrol stations (but no ownership stuff in this case?), but they're seemingly still being competitive with Sainsbury's and Tesco's.

      • theazureguy 3 hours ago
        Yeah Asda is in there. I match on brand name directly rather than the API's is_supermarket flag because that flag is all over the place (loads of Asda stations don't have it set). So it explicitly checks for Asda, Tesco, Morrisons, Sainsbury's, Co-op, Costco.

        Your point about post-PE Asda is interesting, I've noticed it too. If you want to see how they compare individually you can check the brands page on the site, shows each supermarket chain as its own line. Pretty easy to split the supermarket aggregate out per brand too, would probably show Asda creeping back towards the independents since the takeover. Might add that.

        • lotsofpulp 1 hour ago
          It is well established that Costco sells Top Tier brand fuel at zero margins, so you could have just tracked Costco prices. In the US, Walmart, Kroger, and Albertsons also sell fuel at near zero margins, but it’s not Top Tier branded.
    • yzydserd 2 hours ago
      > So I built a scraper that hits the UK government's mandatory Fuel Finder API every 10 minutes and stores every price change. 90k records across 7,700 stations since January.

      Only 1 change per station per week on average? Fewer than I expected. Not sure I'd call it a scraper, myself.

      157p/L national average is about 8 USD/G.

  • traceroute66 3 minutes ago
    Nice work, couple of observations ...

    The interactive map seems to be a bit broken (lots of grey dots vs brand colours, lots of broken mouseovers where many stations don't show price on hover)

    Dashboard Price Comparison, you really need to re-think the colours, perhaps especially Shell Red vs Esso Red

  • isoprophlex 2 hours ago
    If only this wasn't hosted on azure, we'd be able to actually look at the data
    • varispeed 2 hours ago
      I thought cloud was supposed to be an answer to sudden surges in traffic. /s
      • dspillett 2 hours ago
        It is, up to the point where payment limits hit, or things are not set to auto-scale for that reason, or the project just isn't designed in a way to actually take advantage of the scaling (in which case you might be better off on your own/rented servers which will be much cheaper than one of the big clouds, unless you don't want the faf of managing backups & other admin and freedom from that is worth the extra cost).
    • callamdelaney 2 hours ago
      Microslopinator strikes again
  • johannes1234321 2 hours ago
    In Germany fuel processes must be reported to the anti trust authority (Bundeskartellamt) the data is than published to providers of apps and websites. Unfortunately there isn't a free public data stream from them.

    List of authorized places using the data: https://www.bundeskartellamt.de/DE/Aufgaben/Markttransparenz...

    One of those vendors publishes it as creative commons data set, though. Including historic data. https://creativecommons.tankerkoenig.de/

  • mootothemax 29 minutes ago
    If you can find a way to combine this with local population to end up at pence per litre per thousand population, I bet you’d uncover some fun trends. Bet it’d also get interesting if combined with population within an X min drive too.

    Tho really need some car population per road segment stats to drive the most out of it IMO.

  • whynotmaybe 1 hour ago
    In Québec every station must report price change within 5 minutes and we have access to a map https://regieessencequebec.ca/

    For now data can only be exported as xlsx but with the open data orientation of Québec's government, I guess it will be available soon

  • theazureguy 1 hour ago
    Update for anyone who hit a slow site earlier: b1ms postgres wasn't having a great time with 140 concurrent users. scaled the db up, bumped the instance, and shipped in-memory output caching while the thread was live so repeated requests stop hammering the db. Site is fully up and fast now. appreciate the interest, genuinely didn't expect to front page today.
  • Already__Taken 1 hour ago
    The Tesco premium/super e5 is so much cheaper than everyone else I'm actually pretty sceptical of it.
    • theazureguy 1 hour ago
      checked the db, tesco e5 is 163.8p average across 292 stations in the last 21 days. Worth spot checking a few specific stations if it still looks off to you.
  • tuwtuwtuwtuw 34 minutes ago
    I'll just mention that the site is very hard to read for me (to the degree it's unusable). I know, dark mode is cool, but for me it causes immediate eye strain.

    I have read that people with astigmatism will often have an easier time reading light mode. Something like 30% of adults have that issue.

    Just wanted to provide the feedback so you're aware.

  • peterdrohan 2 hours ago
    bros server crashed
    • morkalork 2 hours ago
      Well they did call themselves the azure guy
      • theazureguy 2 hours ago
        haha not quite, db was struggling under the load for a few minutes. b1ms postgres doesn't love 6k requests in 30 mins.
        • firefoxd 2 hours ago
          A 30 second memcached/redis/etc goes a long way when sharing on HN. You go from 6k db hits to 60 hits in 30 minutes. Worked for me since 2013 [0].

          [0]: https://idiallo.com/blog/handling-1-million-web-request

          • theazureguy 2 hours ago
            already on it, just shipped in-memory output caching while the thread was live. next step redis if it needs it
        • kaiwn 1 hour ago
          That’s… 3.3 r/s?
        • GordonS 2 hours ago
          Those tiny b1ms VMs are absolutely pitiful (long time Azure sufferer here). It's crazy how little compute and memory Azure give you for so much money.
          • theazureguy 2 hours ago
            yeah scaling it up now, was hoping to keep costs down but HN had other ideas
            • isoprophlex 2 hours ago
              Using azure managed PG is certainly an interesting choice if you were hoping to keep costs down