The IBM Granite 4.1 family of models

(research.ibm.com)

86 points | by wglb 2 days ago

8 comments

  • wmf 5 hours ago
  • jrgd 5 hours ago
    The few tests i ran i just got Granite4.1 tell me about YOLO repeatedly for no reasons; every questions and prompts were answered with a mention of a vision system unrelated with the task…
    • SequoiaHope 4 hours ago
      I shudder to think of what IBM’s government based clients are using YOLO for.
      • jrgd 1 hour ago
        Or trying to… given the performance of this release.

        I bet though internal tools are more efficient.

      • jrgd 1 hour ago
        That thought now reminds me of the ibm accounting machines and their punch cards… Not a great perspective.
  • RickHull 4 hours ago
    What is an enterprise workload?
    • Havoc 3 hours ago
      Aside from this just being standard corporate speak copy, there is an element of truth there - the granite models are likely to give you more plain toneless responses rather than a rainbow of emojiis. Which in corporate setting can be useful
      • skiing_crawling 2 hours ago
        That actually sounds nice in theory. A model for getting work done and nothing else, which doesn't have to account or be trained for any type of user engagement. Like how chatgpt/claude are wasting their capacity on social niceties and glazing the user. I don't know if granite is one such but I'd bet that many of the other popular models can't be since they are consumer facing.
      • weird-eye-issue 1 hour ago
        Existing models from OpenAI etc never return emojis when using the raw APIs unless you ask for it
    • reliablereason 1 hour ago
      Pragmatically enterprise tends to mean less refined, designed by committee and expensive.

      In this case i would guess it is mostly a justification for taking a part of the LLM pie.

    • swiftcoder 3 hours ago
      OCR'ing tables into spreadsheets, apparently
    • hbbio 2 hours ago
      "This approach presents a significant opportunity for optimization and strategic realignment to better meet our core objectives."
  • trilogic 2 hours ago
  • DonHopkins 1 hour ago
    They should go all in on AI first and rebrand as AIBM, it has a nice ring to it.

    "IBM, UBM, we all BM for IBM." --David Gerrold, "When HARLIE Was One".

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/When_HARLIE_Was_One

  • ekianjo 6 hours ago
    The lmstudio link points to granite 4.0
  • immanuwell 1 hour ago
    cool portfolio flex from IBM, but until I see independent benchmarks that aren't cherry-picked, I'll believe it when I see it