2 comments

  • userbinator 56 minutes ago
    Speaking of recent x86 processors with an FPU, it's notable that some variants of the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Quark were basically a 486SX core with some Pentium instructions "backported", and hence lack the FPU.

    Of course there's also the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vortex86#Vortex86SX , an interesting legacy from an era when there was far more competition in x86-compatible CPUs.

    • Aurornis 17 minutes ago
      Interesting to look back on an era where companies could create an entire CPU and bring it to market with reasonably competitive performance.

      CPUs today are so powerful and complex that it takes highly capitalized companies many years and generations to get something that approaches modern performance expectations. Arguably we’re still waiting for a RISC-V CPU to reach the market that has decent performance.

  • scorpionfeet 4 hours ago
    One small nit:

    “it cannot have an FPU added (that is not the case with Cyrix 486S…)”

    This is mostly true but the 486SX can be paired with a math coprocessor via the 487SX, but the 487SX is actually a full CPU that disables the SX, not a full FPU!

    • phire 3 hours ago
      The point is still very valid. You can't add a math coprocessor to the 486SX.

      The 487SX is nothing more than a polite fiction to allow consumers (and the computer shops selling to them) to continue their existing habits of buying FPU-less systems, (because most people didn't need FPUs) safe in the knowledge they could buy the upgrade if they ever needed it.

      It actually cost the motherboard vendors quite a bit more to wire up the second socket, so obviously there was demand for the flexibility.