4 comments

  • swores 33 days ago
    Discussed a few days ago, 554 comments: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47362528

    (But it's a big enough story that I'm glad to see it on front page again.)

    • dang 33 days ago
      Comments moved thither. Thanks (and, er, sorry)!
      • swores 33 days ago
        I don't think that apology was needed... at least I can't figure out a reason for it. But thanks anyway (and sorry).
        • dang 33 days ago
          Well, merging the threads meant the story was off the frontpage again
          • swores 33 days ago
            Ahh, haha no worries!
    • speefers 33 days ago
      [flagged]
  • bl4kers 33 days ago
    Who is behind it? Doesn't seem to answer
    • sourcegrift 33 days ago
      Meta. Meta is behind Meta's 2B lobbying. Headline is crazy
  • notfed 30 days ago
    > The European Union’s Digital Identity Wallet takes a radically different approach. Zero-knowledge proofs let you verify age without revealing personal data—like showing you’re over 18 without disclosing your birthdate or identity details

    I'm not buying that "I am over 18, but I tell you this without revealing that I am over 18" is a real thing

  • ChrisArchitect 33 days ago
    [dupe] Discussion 4 days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47362528
    • swores 33 days ago
      Ironic to post "[dupe]" as a dupe itself.
      • dwb 33 days ago
        For some reason, this account posts little else. I don’t really get it.
        • swores 33 days ago
          Yeah, I've wondered about that before, but since it seems to more often than not be helpful I figured that even if the motivation was something lame like karma farming it does no harm.

          I was just surprised this time since it seemed too pointless for human judgement to have been involved, yet too slow (4 hours later than my noticing it and searching for the thread I remembered seeing days before) to be a bot...

          • ChrisArchitect 33 days ago
            The only thing surprising is repeat-offender OP's low-quality submission and all of the repeat discussion of a large topic from less than a week ago. Keep putting the duplicate discussions up, keep finding us highlighting the previous discussion.
            • swores 28 days ago
              Sorry for doubting you! I had thought it possible someone had set up a dupe-commenting bot (and like I said before, I didn't object if that was what you'd done), and was too lazy to look into whether you were a real person or only posted the dupe comments.

              But speaking as a random HN reader, I appreciate comments pointing out previous discussions :) (Though I don't think it's always a negative to have a dupe on a different day)

      • ChrisArchitect 33 days ago
        Just flagging it properly since ironically no one saw yours and kept filling the thread up with duplicate discussion.