13 comments

  • dian2023 19 minutes ago
    I really like this concept. What's the advantage of using your app instead of using ChatGPT etc to surface this kind of content?

    I get you have this 'curated' dataset but how much better than a good prompt for ChatGPT do you think this is?

    (not intending to be negative, I'm genuinely curious)

  • ElasticBottle 6 hours ago
    I've wanted something like this for a long time! Waiting for the android /browser release!
    • Jsuh 1 minute ago
      I'm sorry we don't support those yet! Can you send me an email @ [email protected] so I can shoot you an email when we have a browser version?
  • bakkerinho 12 hours ago
    Not available in my country / region says the AppStore. Greetings from Europe.
    • Jsuh 12 hours ago
      ah, i submitted some EU trader requirements stuff. could you shoot me an email @ [email protected] so i can let you know when we get approved?
  • pickleglitch 13 hours ago
    Browser* Buddy

    *Not available in a browser.

    • alien0006 13 hours ago
      We originally started with a webapp but found ourselves using it much more on our phones.

      Happy to bring back the webapp if there’s strong interest!

      • pickleglitch 12 hours ago
        Well, by limiting yourselves to iPhone you are eliminating at least half of smartphone users, and 100% of non-smartphone users.
      • NoelJacob 12 hours ago
        Please do. Also try making a newtab page.
      • christoff12 12 hours ago
        Would be much easier to try. I was expecting a chrome extension.
      • greazy 10 hours ago
        yes please bring it back. browsers work perfectly fine on phones
    • swyx 13 hours ago
      lol yeah why not do webapp so much easier than ios
  • rishabhaiover 11 hours ago
    Interesting concept, though I’m not sure I’d install something called `browserbuddy` on my phone.
  • rd 13 hours ago
    Go Hoos good work Wadehra
  • achandra03 13 hours ago
    congrats arnav, you've come a long way from the balz days :)
  • wxce 13 hours ago
    Why isn't there a working website? You've been up since 2024
    • pickleglitch 13 hours ago
      Seriously, the product focuses on personal and independent content, primarily published on websites, but the app only works in iOS. That seems like a fundamental mismatch.
  • nwhnwh 13 hours ago
    Translation: You, Android user, is a second class citizen. And you, you are using the browser??? I won't even describe you, because you are less than that.
  • thuuuomas 13 hours ago
    My concern with something like this is content marketing or other forms of surreptitious advertising.

    Will you clearly indicate “boosted” authors/publishers/pieces?

    • alien0006 13 hours ago
      We don’t boost any authors/publishers/pieces. We don’t have any specific plan to monetize right now, but many AI-based products seem to work well as paid subscriptions vs using an advertising model.
      • skeeter2020 8 hours ago
        >> We don’t have any specific plan to monetize right now

        YC has changed. It's like we're back in the late 90's!

  • yoavm 13 hours ago
    This is what I'm using Hacker News for. It doesn't require an app, it's super fast, the curating is done by real people (not by AI), and often the comments add a lot of value to the discussed article.
    • Jsuh 11 hours ago
      We check hackernews every day too but often have a hard time exploring specific interests that are not currently trending.

      You're right though, the community/comments add a ton of value and its something we're thinking on.

      • trinsic2 1 hour ago
        the tool should be on the open web as a primary, not closed off in a walled garden mobile app.
    • chrisweekly 6 hours ago
      I tend to find substantially more value in HN comments than in the posted articles.
    • SunshineTheCat 13 hours ago
      [flagged]
      • yoavm 13 hours ago
        I didn't intend for my comment to be mean. Generally, I think that sometimes the most useful advice one can give a founder (like myself) is "you should consider to pivot". Sure it's not fun to hear, but it can save you a couple of months. In this specific case, I think it'll help the founders to consider that the pain they're aiming to solve might already be answered, better, by existing simpler solutions. I don't think the best comment to leave is always "Amazing idea, wonderful execution!!!".
        • SunshineTheCat 8 hours ago
          I didn't think your comment was mean, I just think sometimes people are a little too quick to tell other makers their idea won't work without putting enough time/thought/consideration into if that's true.

          When it comes to finding product market fit (and providing feedback into if it exists) sometimes it helps to consider whether or not you are in that market.

          I am never buying a Labubu but you better believe there is product market fit there.

        • cubecul 10 hours ago
          Why even give "advice"? Why not phrase it as:

          "I get a lot of value from HN: it's fast, doesn't require an app, curating is done by real people and the comments add a lot. I'd be curious to learn what types of content your product surfaces that's different from HN?"

  • mbreese 11 hours ago
    How much research did you guys do on the name? This might be the most amazing product ever, but I'll never know. I'm not inclined to install anything with the name "X Buddy". For me, it brings the negative associations from this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BonziBuddy

    It's not a knock on anything you've done, because it looks pretty nice. But, just based on the name, I'm not sure I know what it does or why I'd want it. That's a decent amount of inertia to overcome to get someone to install an app on their phone called "browser buddy". It just screams malware to me... but maybe I'm just paranoid.

    • alien0006 11 hours ago
      Yikes! We'd never heard of that.

      We picked "Browser Buddy" to name our surfing penguin logo.

      • mbreese 10 hours ago
        I suspected you hadn't, which is why I wanted to bring it up. It's admittedly a pretty dated reference, but was really common right around 2000. At least, it was commonly installed where I was around 2001. I don't think it was malware right away (it's been a while), but by the end of it's run, it seemed sketchy at best.

        It's a tough balance to get right... you want to be approachable and friendly so that people will try your app. But you don't want to come across as a big purple gorilla or Clippy. I do like the penguin!