11 comments

  • randogp 2 days ago
    The EU publishes monthly bulletins around DNA surveillance programs. "The bulletin summarise the reported results and findings from European national wastewater surveillance programmes. It also informs about the local surveillance projects and non-EU countries participating as observers" https://wastewater-observatory.jrc.ec.europa.eu/#/bulletin
  • eskathos 2 days ago
    The danish government has been doing that for a while, with open data available per region: https://en.ssi.dk/surveillance-and-preparedness/surveillance...

    They also lead the EU wide project to track infections across the largest cities across europe: https://en.ssi.dk/surveillance-and-preparedness/internationa...

  • rsktaker 2 days ago
    My university recently discovered a covid outbreak at my freshman dorm by testing the wastewater; that was the first I heard about the technique. It's especially effective for this use case: "Traces of SARS-CoV-2 can show up in an infected person’s feces days before any symptoms are detected, and even when a person ultimately shows no symptoms at all." [1]

    [1] https://adminvc.ucla.edu/expanded-wastewater-testing-program....

    • rogerrogerr 2 days ago
      Ah yes, a disease they only know to worry about because of testing wastewater. This doesn’t seem “effective” for any real-life sane goal.
  • worstspotgain 2 days ago
    Wastewater hits in SF reported back in June:

    SF Chronicle: https://www.sfchronicle.com/health/article/h5n1-avian-flu-sa...

    LA Times: https://archive.is/VSjBB

    • ethbr1 2 days ago
      Part of the article's suggestion is to better differentiate monitoring points, so as to divide farm-related hits from urban hits.

      That said, in cities that have combined storm and sewer system, the latter is a lot more difficult.

      But in general, it is a uniquely politically-palatable continuous monitoring solution.

      The public doesn't want to think about what happens underneath a toilet or drain, so no one cares if someone is sampling and testing it.

      • worstspotgain 2 days ago
        SF has a combined sewer system, but it has zero farms. One question is whether it was more likely to be a signal from wild birds (into the runoff system) than humans (into the sewer.)

        There's very little rain in the summer months, the average for July rounds off to 0.0in. I don't remember if there was any significant rain in May or June, but I'd be surprised if it was more than 1-5% of the total. I guess there's lawn irrigation, though.

        • dredmorbius 2 days ago
          SF has pretty limited lawn irrigation as well. Depending on how the sewerage system is divided, some parts of the city have effectively none.
      • Terr_ 2 days ago
        Also, it's not so finely-grained that it seems like a privacy problem.
  • tonetegeatinst 2 days ago
    Pretty sure I heard wastewater can be used to detect sudden spikes of drug usage or sudden outbreaks. Not surprising.
  • worstspotgain 2 days ago
  • wigster 2 days ago
    why not just put the word "genetic/genome" at the front of that headline?

    *kers.

  • osigurdson 2 days ago
    Aren't most jurisdictions doing this now?
  • rnweiher 2 days ago
    [dead]